I was just curious as to whether the industry was ignoring the continent out of ill-advised business decisions, or the sponsorship was in line with the market, as if it was the former, there'd be a reqasonable expectation of a short-term change in sponsorship level given the right action. Seeing as it's the latter, it would appear that sponsorship isn't likely to increase absent market growth. Any allusion to automags was meant to convey a shared frustration with the situation, which seems to demand finding a way to do more with less.
First of all, I think it depends how you define "Europe" if Missy's 15% is correct.... if you include Russia and the all eastern European countries, it's probably more like 20% - but anyhow - it is significantly lower than the US.
What IS interesting though, is that Europe as a whole is still growing tremendously, whereas US growth has stagnated.
I do not have solid numbers for market growth, and can only go by what people from different countries tell me - but I would guess market growth is around 10-12% yearly at the moment (less in western Europe - more in eastern Europe and Russia).
What this means is, that paintball companies (if they are clever), will intensify their marketing in the European market, because that is where they will grow their business in the next 4-5 years... probably upto a level where the European market is around 50% of the US market.
In the longer term, Asia will become very interesting - in about 3-4 years time... especially Thailand, Malaysia, Taiwan, Singapore and South Korea - with China following 1-2 years later but in the long term becoming the biggest paintball market in the world.
Anyway - my point is that all the US companies that battle over 1-2% of the market in the US, and spend millions doing it, would get a much better ROI focussing a bit more on the European market in the next few years.
Nick