Originally posted by mikeanywhere
But why didnt he as the payer clean it as the game hadnt started yet so therefore couldnt be considered to be wiping?
There's less than 10 seconds till game on, one hand is holding the marker against the netting, the other is touching the ground, he's ready to sprint to the snake.
He's not going to compromise his breakout run and risk getting shot on the break to wipe a completely unexpected non-game related hit - it's not something you expect to happen with a couple of seconds before game on and you only have a split second to react.
There were two options as I see it.
1st Like mikeanywhere mentioned - the marshall who saw it should have immediately cancelled the 10 seconds and halted the game. Wiped him down and restarted the 10 second call.
2nd Failing that he should have been on the player like a rash the second he gets to his primary to wipe the hit to avoid any confusion from another marshall, which is what happened.
Originally posted by davejeff
it was merely the fact that the Tigers got a rematch when one of their players was called for a ball that the opposition didn’t shoot…
Two players were pulled for it, completely unnecessarily in the end, as the second marshall correctly called a 1-4-1 (But the orginal marshall who saw the hit sat back and said nothing?? That was very wrong). So we're then 2 players down within seconds for no reason.
Just to say - I like the 1-4-1 rule. I had a great time on Sunday and there were some very good calls made on Sunday because of the rule, in addition to all the bad ones we're hearing about. I believe it still comes back to marshall education on ALL of the rules that they're meant to be enforcing to make sure a game runs as smoothly as possible.