NSPL 19.03.06 - The STUPID new 141 Rule

[Ralph]

Originally posted by lettucecheesecake
Just because you've not noticed being hit doesnt mean they guy thats hit you didnt see it and we all know how much it pisses us off when someone plays on.

One assumes that if you saw it hit an opponent you would be screaming blue murder to get them checked in any case

 

[Ralph]

Originally posted by Stan
The slight grey area at the moment is - if he runs in, checks himself, doesn't find any paint and then fires should he then be 1-4-1ed.

Mmmmm.......

I thought this rule was designed to get rid of any 'Grey Area'

 

[Nick G]

Pack shots

In my own opinion, It's shots on the pack i find hardest to justify. When the adrenalin is pumping and you are running flat out from the break, if you cop one on the pack, surely everyone must agree you are not going to feel it. If the marshalls are on the ball they should pick that up straight away. If it is within a matter of seconds surely a good decision would be to just remove that player.

 

[Beano]

I have judged my team as hard as any other team. Both my teams that played on the day have received 1-4-1s! HPG even 2 1-4-1 in one game. So don't call me biast.

With the comment that Oli made i agree with him, and with the 141 rule as much as i hate it, Oli and the guys on both fields called the games as fair as they could, though i disagreed with one call,

The 141 rule will take time for all teams to adapt,

Beano's Advice: Chill, have a Beer and look forward to READING!!!

 

[Ralph]

Originally posted by Stan
The marshalls were diligently removing paint off both sides of bunkers between games on Sunday.

Who are they are they any good ?

I got some skirting boards that need the paint scraping of them

 

[Stan]

Originally posted by Ralph
Mmmmm.......

I thought this rule was designed to get rid of any 'Grey Area'

Ok - bad choice of words. The most contentious area is as i described above. To the letter of the law as i understand it then yes, he should be 1-4-1ed which is a bit harsh but for the greater good perhaps this is a small price to pay.

 

[Ralph]

Pack shots

Originally posted by Nick G
In my own opinion, It's shots on the pack i find hardest to justify. When the adrenalin is pumping and you are running flat out from the break, if you cop one on the pack, surely everyone must agree you are not going to feel it. If the marshalls are on the ball they should pick that up straight away. If it is within a matter of seconds surely a good decision would be to just remove that player.

Far Tooooo easy mate

 

[lettucecheesecake]

if you get to your bunker off the break with a hit and play on then u get 1-4-1ed. its simple. youve just gotta make sure youve not been hit before carrying on playing. The thing we need to do is set in stone is what we class as playing on for this to work properly.

 

[Ralph]

Originally posted by Stan
Ok - bad choice of words. The most contentious area is as i described above. To the letter of the law as i understand it then yes, he should be 1-4-1ed which is a bit harsh but for the greater good perhaps this is a small price to pay.

I didn't mean to pick up so much on the 'Grey Area' but it was that which i was debating with Missy Q in fight club

 

[Ralph]

Originally posted by lettucecheesecake
if you get to your bunker off the break with a hit and play on then u get 1-4-1ed. its simple. youve just gotta make sure youve not been hit before carrying on playing.

14 players = 14 Refs ?