What i meant was that when a team wins the series with reefing points it´s ok... And then they don´t use it to say who the top teams are now?!? see what i mean buddy?Originally posted by sjt19
Not really, because the EXL teams have been chosen on results last season, not who got points for judging. All the teams have had points for judging removed. Stands to reason
Hey Gareth, in advocating the representation of different countries in the EXL, I realize it compromises the ethos of having the best teams, but not much.Originally posted by sykesg
Hi Pete,
'the king returns' superb film!!!!
One from each country?
The EXL is a showcase to the best europe has to offer. If England is lucky enough to have three of the best teams in europe, therefore three in the top eight then thats great news. But they shouldn't be cut to make room for teams from other countries who don't have the ranking, financial backing, sponsorship or infrastructure to compete with the likes of us, you, legion, ton-ton and joy. Not to mention they have to be up and running in time for the 2004 season.
Magnus, what position would you have had to get at Campaign before you would have been placed higher than Shockwave in the World Rankings???Originally posted by Magnus HC
Yeah sure... As long as we get points for it, so that we can win the exl series
But then we can´t be in 2005 because we are´nt good players we just LOVE to marshall.....
So you agree that it´s ok to use the points to choose a winner of the series, but not to the fact that it´s also fare to use the same points to choose the 8 best teams to play in that serie next year?!?Originally posted by Robbo
No it's not a double standard, it's called using your brains to get what you want and in this case, it's the best playing teams not teams who have judged.