Isit my anti-NPPL agenda, or the 'NPPL can do no wrong' agenda that is the problem? I just call it like I see it. For example, for three years PSP has had ****ty reffing, we've all known PSP has ****ty reffing, and we have all said PSP has been screwing up by having ****ty reffing. In 2003 and 2004, NPPL had pretty damn good reffing, because NPPL cared about the players, split from PSP, and did things right.
Now, PSP reffing is getting much better this year, and NPPL reffing has gone to crap, and it seems the attitude is that the crappy NPPL reffing is merely an "unfortunate set of circumstances".
I call bull****. NPPL used to be very good at providing good refs and now they are very bad at it and it can not be an accident. It looks very much like the reffingbudget for 2006 compared to 2003 has been slashed, and the priority attached to maintaining a solid reffing program appears to have been severely reduced.
There are only so many people involved in organizing reffing for NPPL: Chuck, for a while Phil, and then Dan. Are yu seriously suggesting that the reffing problems this year are mostly Dan's fault? If that's the case, then great, get rid of Dan, install Ron Kilbourne or whoever, and everything will be fine.
But if NPPL is spending a total of $18,720 an event on referee wages, and it's not because Dan PErez got a $60,000 event budget and paid himself $30,000/event, the problem is NOT just Dan Perez, and pretending that NPPL isn't the problem and you can just swap guys and fix it is silly.
Maybe I should have been more specific:
Spending $18,000 an event on the referees and expecting a good result is downright stupid.
You are right that there are more costs to reffing than just the refs - but in NPPL's case, what are they? Some overhead on Dan Perez, but from what I've been told, they don't spend anything on travel for refs, they don't provide any food or water or apparent supplementary staff (other than the $25/day food allowance already factored in), so that leaves.. what, jersies? Assuming they are not donated by CSG. (Worst case, $20/jersey would make it $19,000 an event.) Also factor in that some of Dan is paid for by charging $100/ref for certification classes and $35/ref in recertification fees.
Hell, NPPL doesn't even pay the employer share of taxes, they 1099 everyone, which means the refs lose another 7% of their money covering employer taxes.
I also have to question whether you've got a good understanding of what it takes to have a solid reffing program if you're recommending Boogie for the job. Boogie is a SPECTACULAR on-field judge. I have no doubt that he can also do a great job training refs.
But the person you are looking for also needs to run the program from an administrative level, and I think that's really actually more important than how well you train the refs in the certification classes. You have to know which refs do well in the classes, which refs do well at the events, how much of a budget you need, how to best spend it, how to prmote your reffing organization, etc. If you asked Boogie himself, I'm 99% sure he'd tell you he wanted nothing to do with any of that (I've had a similar conversation with him personally), and if need be, the person you hire to run the program (I agree Ron would be a good choice if you can work out the politics with his pro team involvement, maybe even isolate him from direct involvement on the Pro field) could hire Boogie to be a head ref and train refs.
The important thing is this problem goes beyond the usual "it's tough to find qualified officials to ref paintball tournaments". This goes to a series of willful decisions about budget and fees ($35 recertification fee?) that indicate a problem with whoever is making the decisions. While trying to put all that on Dan may make for the best press release, it doesn't solve the problem either. If this is going to be fixed, you can't pretend that NPPL has been doing a good job with bad people. They've been making extremely poor decisions in regards to referees and I think the only way to fix it is to hand over the correct amount of dollars to someone who is given full authority to run the program as they see fit without further interference from the people who got the "program" into the position it is currently in.
NPPL can't just "pretend" there's a PRO referee program anymore, they are going to need to actually have one, including an actual person in charge of it and an actual, reasonable, budget for it.