i don't think the 'value for money' question is being considered correctly Dougal.
If you compare number of games to cost, it's horrible value.
You're paying for a higher standard, esentially you're paying a premium to compete with the best.
Have they killed the 'street paintball' field idea for non qualifing teams? I certainly thought that gave good value for money, you get to hammer out some extra games with whoever is kicking around. [edit] freddy says that the field was open for some street ball action, why did no one use it? [/edit]
Dougal
Maybe the question should be, what kind of player am I? Do you play paintball for fun, or is the competition what really matters? If i was playing purely for fun, then i would probably stay at home and play domestic events, as the cost is much cheaper.
I think for a lot of players there comes a point where they decide that international paintball is simply too expensive, and they choose a series closer to home.
I'm not saying that you should 'like it or get out'. I think Frank's suggestions of going to less fields, and all prelims on 1 day, is a much better idea. The promoters have to consider all sorts of ways of making the events cheaper for the players, forcing people to take less time off is one great idea! The cost of competing is huge, and increasing each year. If Promoters want more teams to attend their events, they have to start getting really creative with how they help the players get there cheaper.
Or get some better outside sponsorship, so players don't have to pay entry fees...
Or free beer.