Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Madrid

Chicago

New Member
Jan 31, 2005
1,380
0
0
Visit site
jotajotaZ said:
You've opened up my eyes, thanks. My life is got a 180 degree turn now. All I got to do now is call all my customers and tell them "hey, do the work yourselves, if you're not willing to do it, why should I?" sit back and enjoy my daiquiri until I get my paycheck. :rolleyes:
You missed the entire point - YOU get a reasopnable paycheck, the promoters don't.

Take Robbo's suggestion that Laurent run all the events. That would be great, except then Laurent wouldn't have any time left to do anything that actually made him some money. Are you guys willing to pay more so there's a reasonable profit margin to make doing all the events worth Laurent's time?
 

Mark Toye-Nexus

Rushers
Jul 18, 2001
1,586
14
63
Sarf London
Chicago said:
You missed the entire point - YOU get a paycheck, the promoters don't.
I'm not 100% sure of course, but I'd like to bet that the promoters may take their own expenses etc from the budget and the figures therefore look worse than they are.

After all, if I ran a company I wouldnt present my accounts for tax assessment and then pay myself after tax!!

See my point?

Figures are maleable
 

HUSH HUSH

Menace2Society
Feb 11, 2005
382
4
28
On The South Coast Baby
Krusty said:
What really makes me to write here is just one thing. How can a headmarshal make 17 (seventeen) games thinking the time limit is 6 (six) minutes? The "problem" was only discovered when my team (Paintoon) was winning Kellys by men (4-2) and the headmarshal yells "GAME OVER" when there were still 60 seconds to play. One of the teams loose 2 points for sure... since we were with some advantage we felt a little more "stolen".
When our captain asked for explanations the marshal said: "Didnt you know that games have six minutes?". Since we were on travel during the captain reunion we couldn't argue with that... we thought it was said int the reunion.
After some research we try to get some justice on the result complaining to Ulrich. The answer was "do not expect nothing to be done!". That headmarshal continued reffering all weekend.
We had the same situation when we were loosing in a quarter final game. We held for the draw as we were in a bad situation, to be told after the game that it was 7min games but all day Fri/ Sat we were told 6mins due to too many teams and lack of fields.:confused:

The venue was complete and utter sh1t.... 3x toilets for all those players and spectators with no toilet seats or paper... Thanks to the guy who litterally saved my A$$ by passing me some hand tissues under the door when he heard my cries for loo roll:D

The field surface was like no other but we got on with it because we had too. Me personally i found the fields ok as they were different and challenging... no injuries to players that i heard of.

Tooooo hot and the Head marshall on the Tomahawk field should be fcuking sacked or relegated to a bunker cleaner as he doesnt know his A$$ Hole from his elbow.:(
 

MissyQ

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
663
0
0
Harlem, NY
Visit site
And thats exactly why I have a problem with Chicago - he also gets ill-informed/puddled people to believe his posts as they suddenly think he's "on the money", as he 'backs it up' with made-up stories and fabricated quotes allocated to people who do know what they are on about, but didn't say what he attributed to them.

Its a 2-fold problem: There's Chicago, and then there's the people that think he actually tells the truth....
 

Baca Loco

Ex-Fun Police
Chicago said:
You missed the entire point - YOU get a reasopnable paycheck, the promoters don't.

Take Robbo's suggestion that Laurent run all the events. That would be great, except then Laurent wouldn't have any time left to do anything that actually made him some money. Are you guys willing to pay more so there's a reasonable profit margin to make doing all the events worth Laurent's time?
No, Chi-town, YOU missed the entire point. The promoters offer a tournament or a series and charge a specific fee to participate. They represent what that tournament will offer. Whether or not they make a reasonable profit or not isn't the players problem. The current situation, sustainable or not, was precipitated by the promoters and their competition. For whatever reasons the NPPL/PP upped the ante on expectations and the others followed suit. If they all want to plead poverty now then fine, let them make their case, but that isn't what happens. For example, NPPL started using some quasi-turf surface and the MS upped that ante by going with XL Turf and PSP made noises of doing the same. Are the players to blame for expecting too much? Nonsense.

You're beginning to sound like you're making the case for your own operation by proxy and taking the occasional criticism of promoters personally.
 

MissyQ

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
663
0
0
Harlem, NY
Visit site
Loco is right, you advertise an event as being something, top-flight, best around, etc, and there are minimum levels of competence and performance that are to be expected, and met, otherswise you are not delivering the product you marketed.
The PSP/NPPL/MS could run events cheaper, or profitably, but choose instead to raise the levels of their events in order to attract attention from players, teams, press and sponsors.
And Chicago, what/who suddenly made you the defender of promotors? I'm not sure I like that, it strips credibility from them. I prefer you on the other side, making ridiculous statements and providing financial figures that lack 30% (at least) of the outgoing expenditure.
 

Chicago

New Member
Jan 31, 2005
1,380
0
0
Visit site
MissyQ said:
And Chicago, what/who suddenly made you the defender of promotors? I'm not sure I like that, it strips credibility from them. I prefer you on the other side, making ridiculous statements and providing financial figures that lack 30% (at least) of the outgoing expenditure.
Did I say it was a complete list of outgoing expendatures? No. Did I in fact SPECIFICALLY say in the post that I had neglected several items as it was an off-the-top-of-my-head list, and then also list some of the things I didn't include the first time through? Yes. It wasn't supposed to be an exhaustive list, and I said it wasn't an exhaustive list; it was supposed to give an idea of some of the things that make running events expensive.


Anyway, I'm the defender of reason. In this case, I don't think 'the players' are being reasonable. I'm not defending promoters. Madrid sucked compared to the other events and I'm not disputing that, and I'm not saying the promoters are not to be blamed for letting players have one set of expectations and providing something else. I don't need to spend post after post saying "It's the promoter's fault!" as there are plenty of other people who have that covered.


What I am trying to get you guys to see is that blaming the promoters, being mad at the promoters, demanding that the promoters promise to fix it, etc, IS NOT GOING TO MAKE THE EVENTS BETTER!


Baca brings up that NPPL raised the level of expectation. What he didn't mention is that they also raised the entry fees. NPPL entry fees are nearly DOUBLE the Millenium entry fees. To go back to the car analogy, if I go to my local Yugo dealer, and the salesman tells me that he can sell me a car with the same quality as a BMW for half the price, is the salesman a sleazeball for making such a promise? Sure. If I believe him and buy the car, am I being a bit unreasonable by expecting it to be true? If it turns out the car sucks and I come back to the dealer and he says, "Sorry about that, but I'll sell you this other car for the same price, and THIS one will be as good as a BMW", and I believe him, am I being pretty stupid? You bet.


Look, the promoters are not going to tell you that you can't have what you want. For one reason, they probably think they CAN give you what you want, and sometimes they manage to pull it off. But if the players are just going to keep going to events and keep their same level of expectations for the same amount of revenue provided, the players are going to CONTINUE to get some events like Madrid. You can BLAME the promoters, and you can be jstified in blaming the promoters, but it is not going to fix the problem.


If you want events that are consistently at the quality of NPPL events, go to the board and say this: "We want you to stop letting us believe you can provide the events we want at the current pricing. Please double our entry fees to NPPL levels and consistently provide us with NPPL quality events."

Now, maybe you don't want that. Maybe you'd rather pay half-price and get the occasional lemon; there are plenty of people who buy Yugos. But expecting to get a BMW for a Yugo price, EVEN if the Yugo dealer promises you that their car is as good as a BMW, is just plain not reasonable.



So please, stop trying to twist what I'm saying into "the promoters are saints and players are evil and you're just defending promoters". The promoters are just people and the players are just people and if the players want consistent events at the level they expect, they are going to have to lower their expectations or pay more money, as no amount of making the promoters promise is going to work. All it's going to do is give you someone to blame the next time an event falls short because the resources to make sure every event is good are just not there.


You guys are looking for someone to blame. I'm looking for a way to fix it. Getting rid of Pedro ain't, by itself, going to fix it.
 

MissyQ

New Member
Jan 9, 2006
663
0
0
Harlem, NY
Visit site
Hello Chicago,
I decided to ignore most of your post as its impossible to tell whether you are making stuff up or not, the only thing I can take out of it is that you are still doing the thing where you put stuff that aren't quotes in quotation marks.

In my opinion, posting incomplete financials, whether you intended to or not, is just as misleading as posting fake ones. I say again, if you don't know the numbers, quit making them up. What are you trying to acheive?

Calling yourself a 'defender of reason' was funny though.:)

One more thing - I am guessing you have never met Pedro - would that be true?
 

rpcruzr

New Member
Aug 22, 2005
16
0
0
Lisbon - Portugal
Visit site
Robbo said:
I don't think we are getting ahead of ourselves when all we expect is value for money, if that's getting ahead of ourselves then we really are in a lot of trouble.
I think I understand what you are saying. That this is a competence problem and that there are other promoters that are more keen on making a profit AND organizing a good venue. Agreed.

We need to realise, once and for all, that we - the players - are making this possible and that there with be no championship without us. Agreed also.

We need to be confident that the future holds great things for us, and we should not expect to be robbed of those expectations. "Some, see things as they are and say why. I see things that never were and ask: why not?", I'm all for it as well.

What I am saying is that, probably, the expectations that the players have, are more in sync with other more established sports than paintball. Regardless of the incredible advances our sport has had in the recent years.

I'm not saying that organizing such an event is easy, and I totally agree that taking a stand against the paying customer is blatantly stupid and that we should do something about it. However, we, as a community of players, must get our acts together and focus on what is achievable for now.

If we want to have a respectable and credible sport, we must make sure that we take positive and solid steps towards improvement, but also be capable of securing long-term value for the companies that are involved in this sport.

I respect your opinion very much. You are a seasoned player and have been involved in this sport for a long time. And I'm pretty sure that you know what you are saying, when you state that the promoters are not making as little money as they say they are. I'm not in disagreeing with you in this part.

Regargind the "there can be only one" organizational approach, I have no doubt that Laurent is a very capable and competent individual, but one of the reasons that he may not be interested in organizing the whole Millennium is that he is not certain that he can maintain the quality across the board in several countries.

Let's get real here, this is not the Continental Circus, we are still, despite the advances, infants in the sporting arena.

"The thousand mile journey starts with the first step, and can only be taken one step at a time."

Best regards,

Rui Cruz