(Hey Nick)
Getting back to the 60 second rule, that could possibly be adjusted so that any penalty in the last seconds of the game regardless of how much time is left on the game clock would swing points...but...I think we're beating a dead horse.
As you've posted on another forum, the standard 7-player format is dead. Multi-goal games along with good rules and much-improved reffing is what is really needed in NPPL and I think the OC fiasco proves that.
I think we mostly agree in principle on what's needed:
¤ Realistic, well-written rules that are expected to be used and enforced as written and that deal much more severely with playing on
¤ Well-trained and reasonably compensated professional referees who are untouchable by sponsors, promoters, key industry figures and teams and who are held accountable for their actions/performance
¤ Respect for both the rules and the officials bolstered by solid backing by the leagues
¤ A multi-goal format with all its inherent advantages
Yeah, you're right that a 60 second rule might not help so much. The main thing is that there must be tougher penalties against playing on PERIOD/FULL STOP so that the motivating incentive for creating chaos and cheating like mofos is put to an end.....the situation we saw, could just as easily have happened with 5 minutes left to play (I don't even know if it WAS within the last minute - I don't think so?).
The psycology of the situation is also very different, from an X-Ball match starting with around a minute left on the clock - and a 7-man match that has been going on for almost 6 minutes!
Last, but not least... when the game is on the line, players WILL cheat, if it can win them the game.
So we mostly agree. I just want to add that the rules and the reffing go hand in hand. Both must be greatly improved simultaneously to fix things....The only way to fix it, no matter what the rules are, is to have good refs... and that is where many leagues are failing.
Players do care a lot about the "other stuff"; that's why NPPL has been so successful. They do care about reffing but I wonder if they are willing to pay what it costs?Players don't care about a cool stadium, a nice pitch, or other stuff - if the reffing sucks - the events sucks.
Right. It should be and is for some promoters but the funds are simply not there (yet) for putting the package together that includes the requisite "other stuff" AND paying what it would cost for the program that is really needed.Reffing should ALWAYS be at the forefront of promoters minds, and be the one area where they put the most money and effort.
Getting back to the 60 second rule, that could possibly be adjusted so that any penalty in the last seconds of the game regardless of how much time is left on the game clock would swing points...but...I think we're beating a dead horse.
As you've posted on another forum, the standard 7-player format is dead. Multi-goal games along with good rules and much-improved reffing is what is really needed in NPPL and I think the OC fiasco proves that.
I think we mostly agree in principle on what's needed:
¤ Realistic, well-written rules that are expected to be used and enforced as written and that deal much more severely with playing on
¤ Well-trained and reasonably compensated professional referees who are untouchable by sponsors, promoters, key industry figures and teams and who are held accountable for their actions/performance
¤ Respect for both the rules and the officials bolstered by solid backing by the leagues
¤ A multi-goal format with all its inherent advantages