D
Pete, my post was in comparing this years cup schedule against previous years cups schedules and their ability to run to time... that's what Tony (oops almost typed someone elses name ) asked about. Not in comparing this years cup against what I would ultimately like to see. Big difference...Originally posted by Robbo
Damn, I just seen this post !!!
And do you think all people there including women and kids share your stoical views on the toilets ?
And the bleachers, you didn’t think they were a problem ?
And the site layout, this was good also was it ?
And the food on offer, that too was ok was it?
Listen Simon, he took more than half a million dollars in entries alone for God's sake, now add on monies for fields, booths and God know else Jerry charges for...and u can defend it ?
Nah, Simon, it was a f'kin farce again and I honestly can't see how you can reduce the problems at this tournament down to just judges, that just smacks of a whitewash !!!!
Originally posted by manike
Pete, my post was in comparing this years cup schedule against previous years cups schedules and their ability to run to time... that's what Tony (oops almost typed someone elses name ) asked about. Not in comparing this years cup against what I would ultimately like to see. Big difference...
In comparison against previous years cups when you look at the schedule and timing this years was excellent... (maybe that's subjective and totally in relation to previous years cups...). The cup could still have been much better, and yes I want more from them for my money.
BUT this years cup was the best World Cup I have ever been to. Still not as good as I would like.
I didn't have a problem with the toilets but I can appreciate more would have been better, and how others could have had issue with it.
I didn't have a problem with the layout. It was a huge event the layout is tough. But I had no major issues with it. What did you think was lacking in the lay out? And what would have made the layout better? The only issues was with the finals, but was that a layout issue or an issue of which fields they chose to run the finals on? not sure.
Yes bleachers should have been better also. And food was crappy, but Cup food has always been like that since they stopped Renick doing it (why did they stop him doing the food?)
BUT
My major issue with this event as a player was the judging. For me as a player, all of those other things were much less significant.
I wasn't defending the cup against what you say Pete, I agree with many of your points, some are more and less significant for me. I was talking about the schedule and how much better it was, and that this years cup was so much better than previous years cups for me. The way this years Cup was scheduled and ran to time WAS, in my opinion, excellent for the size and complexity of the event. Maybe I was a little too 'all encompassing' in my sign off though
manike
So there were portajohns - big deal. Virtually every sport I've played the toilet facilities have been the same - that goes from peewee soccer up to high school cross country - the only big exception was indoor track and field. Hell, even our high school stadium had people using portapots - and we had a couple thousand people of all ages going to those games. I never had to wait for a toilet at Cup, and never more than a minute or two at Chicago Open, and they were always relatively clean when I had to use them (not always spic-and-span, but certainly no worse than toilets in pro stadiums or fast food restaurants).Originally posted by Robbo
Damn, I just seen this post !!!
And do you think all people there including women and kids share your stoical views on the toilets ?
Not at the X Ball field, there were plenty there. You guys just need to cut back on spectators.And the bleachers, you didn’t think they were a problem ?
All of our guys who played 10-man were satisfied with it. Was there a better way to put 10+ fields and vendors on the location? Again, back to the 100+ teams scheduled across 10+ fields bit.And the site layout, this was good also was it?
Right on par with the food at any other athletic event I've been to. Actually, the food was probably BETTER than what they were offering at the Notre Dame football game I was at a couple weekends ago. (Where your choices were hotdogs, pretzels, nachos, pizza.)And the food on offer, that too was ok was it?
So he took in 500k... so what? How much did all of the **** they did cost? People seem to think that because there was high revenue means something. It doesn't, because expenses are high as well. You have to look at what all the costs are, and you guys simply are not doing that.Listen Simon, he took more than half a million dollars in entries alone for God's sake, now add on monies for fields, booths and God know else Jerry charges for...and u can defend it?
You contradict yourself. You say it ain't an athletic event, but instead it's a trade show, convention, and party rolled into one. Yet at the end of your post it's an athletic event. What is it?Originally posted by raehl
So, sure, focus on the toilets, or the food, but that's not going to get the sport anywhere. It may be what the PLAYER wants in an event they're participating in for their enjoyment (which is what you're doing if you're paying entry, less so if you're sponsored) but it's certainly nothing that shoudl be expected as part of an athletic event.
- Chris
Hey Bud, I can talk to you, I can’t talk to people like Chris, so its kinda convenient for me to bring up just one point that I couldn’t be bothered to with Mr ‘Know it all’, it wasn’t the fact that Jerry used portaloos for God's sake, it was the fact that there were only 12 for thousands of people and were a disgusting mess after the first hour of use !!!!!!Originally posted by Buddha 3
You contradict yourself. You say it ain't an athletic event, but instead it's a trade show, convention, and party rolled into one. Yet at the end of your post it's an athletic event. What is it?
I agree that it's much more than a "mere" athletic event, therefore the standards should be much higher. People who attend a football game (the US version) spend about 3-4 hours at the stadium (unless you're a really sad Michigan fan, like Paul ). The avarage attendee at a paintball event spends a whole lot more time around the fields than that. Therefore facilities such as food and restrooms will be attended more, and accordingly must be of a better standard. At a football game, you buy snacks, at a paintball event, you sometimes look for complete meals! There's a big difference between the two.
Tell me, have you ever been to a business convention or trade show? I have. Too often in fact. I can tell you this much. If any of them would have had a few portaloos as facilities, the place would have been burned down and the organisers flogged!
Now perhaps the lack of proper facilities and foods will not be the downfall of paintball on it's own, but it can certainly give paintball that little nudge that it needs to tip over the edge and plummet to it's demise.