Originally posted by Liz
Off topic I know, but it's always puzzled me how any loader that can keep feeding the marker even when upside down can be defined as pure gravity feed. By definition, gravity only pulls down towards the earth so balls being fed upwards away from the earth can't be feeding only by gravity, as they are moving in the opposite direction to the pull.
There was no 'pure' in the definition.
It was about if it needed gravity to keep feeding/working.
Is you are talking about 'PURE' gravity feed then you can't even allow revvies, because the act of agitating the balls helps them to feed. The feeding is not dependent on gravity alone.
Any rule you make HAS to have a clear definition.
People will work within/around that rule.
Keeping a rule simple makes it easier to enforce, but also makes it possible in some circumstances to work around it.
Depending on how this rule is implemented I can already see issues/concerns.
The NXL already broke the 'intent' of their rule, but not the actual rule.
Get a rule, that is clear, simple, and easy to enforce and it's the best hope you have.
I think this rule is a start towards that.
I would rather it's not needed... but pandora's box has been opened.