I'm in 100% agreement with you there also. A lot of our rules are not as good as they could be, nor as well enforced as they ought to be.Originally posted by Baca Loco
but so far I'm having trouble identifying any sanctioning or organizing body that has produced a decent rule or even more than a handful of consistently enforced rules.
I'm just not one to think that's a good reason to let it slide. There are rules in the NPPL which we could run rings around if we wanted (don't let me get started on the "one barrel on the field rule" LMFAO)
The whole reason why I have brought this issue to people's attention before on these forums is so that we can try and come up with a decent rule and solution.
As you point out the difficulty is in testing the guns and how people can tweak and set them up. I'm not nieve enough to think we can eliminate it completely.
What I am actually argueing for here, and what I want to see, is that people who are accidently guilty of breaking this rule aren't banned from the event COMPLETELY and their team get -50 points, since the rule isn't well enough defined or enforceable.
Some people can honestly not think their gun bounces, nor can they get it to themselves, or have any intentions of using it in such a way on the field, and yet get an over zealous judge who can bounce any gun and they will be banned from an event. That's not right is it?
That's what I want to try and get sorted out.
I reckon I could get a decent percentage of electro guns (say 10%) to fall foul of the Millennium rules. That doesn't mean that 10% of players were intending to cheat with FA guns...