Paying reffs..
Originally posted by Magued
Sure no problemo!
How much do you think its enough? 100-200 Usd per day? Hell I could go for 500 usd / day. Its all comming out from your entre fee anyway.
Let me see if we should pay the reffs lets say 100 Usd and we have like 40 reffs/ Day that is 4000 usd
3 days that would be 12 000 usd
At Joy Masters we had 65 teams. Divide 12 000 usd in 65 = 184 usd / team in reffing salary costs
That would make a event like Joy cost each player 23 usd more. Not so expensive, but the question is does it make the reffs better?
Magued
Maybe Millennium has no problemo the way it is. I'll put the same answer here as I put on the Swedish forum:
That's a good question and you, of course, know what kind of margins you have to operate with when putting on a big tournament. I've seen first hand what kind of blood, sweat and tears you have to give to get up a good tournament and you certainly deserve any profit you can get.
I just have to say that it is definitely not fair for NPPL refs to get paid $100 per day (for the miserable job some of them do) and for Millennium judges to not get paid anything or a whole lot less. But then, maybe, it is a whole other system here. If what I hear about the World Cup is true, they couldn't get enough refs despite the higher pay. Millennium doesn't seem to have this problem for some reason despite the requirement for more refs per player.
So, if it's not broke, don't fix it. If you and the other promoters can get enough quality judges for series points only, then go for it. If you have to fill in with paid refs then I think the pay I suggest ($100 for entry-level, $125 for senior and more experienced refs and $200 for head-field judges) is more than reasonable.
Another question that comes to mind is: what will happen if Chuck Hendsch's NPPL with 7-player format comes a lot closer to Millennium? Their rules require $100 per day.
Concerning the question if more pay would mean better judging: no question. Just like in any enterprise, if you pay more you will get more recruits and therefore can be more selective.
PS. I'll repeat: if the quality of Millennium judging is very good, which all indications show me it is, then we can go with the status quo. No need to change that part of anything.
Steve