Originally posted by Cube
damn foiled by my own genius
How do you mean double standards?
Originally posted by Robbo
OK, let's take this one step further, the setting, World Cup 94- Woodland Game- We have the finals consisting of Aftershock of 94, the Ironmen of 94 and the All Americans of 94 and Dynasty of 2003 , who wins ?
I have my views, what about ures ?
Skills/experience aside, I'd have to say that the '94 era teams would whup Dynasty...those blue jerseys with all that white lettering would just stand out and say 'SHOOT ME!' in the woods.Originally posted by Robbo
OK, let's take this one step further, the setting, World Cup 94- Woodland Game- We have the finals consisting of Aftershock of 94, the Ironmen of 94 and the All Americans of 94 and Dynasty of 2003 , who wins ?
I have my views, what about ures ?
Critical issues are vision and reading a woods field. That would negate Dynasty's skill and mobility advantages so the winner has to be--since it's WC--Aftershock (unless '94 was the year Men were winning pretty much everything. I just don't remember. Damned Alzheimer's)Originally posted by rancid
Everyone's scared of answering in case they get it 'wrong' and you tell em to **** off.
We're talking Sterlings here right? Well, in which case Dynasty'd get hammered coming forward.