Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

P2P Kazaa Law Suits

Tom Tom

Damn you ALL
Jul 27, 2001
1,157
3
63
46
Waterlooville
www.thinkingfortuesday.com
And with the price increase you don't feel cheated. People wouldn't have to download (steal) the music if it was more affordable. Look at the price on a "SALE" in a shop. Day to day the CD is £19 but the super sale lets it go for £7 which one are you more likely to buy. Are you stealing then because you are not paying the difference, (Ok no because you still pay a % fee of the cost to produce etc) but the point is You get to choose to pay the reduced fee.

Yes downloading is stealing but it is also exposure. Of course as Baca has said you are not choosing to give your music away free it is taken but this person may tell friends and they may buy the record.

Having worked in radio the amount of free CDs you get is crazy, people are giving the music away free for exposure and the internet is now another tool for this.

What about the ££$$ you pay for the gig. £35 a ticket for some of the bigger gigs.

In the past people made tapes for their friends so only one person bought the record and this was never frowned upon in the same way.

The qualtiy of a download 9 out of 10 is never as good as a bought version anyway.

But it helps with exposure of the film, song any way

Maybe it is wrong but I also beleive what the record company charges for music and film is also wrong.

Even though you can download a film on the net it is not the same as a cinema experience and it just helps with the selection process because of the high cinema prices (£6.20 for an adult ticket) if you doenload a film and like it you are more likely to pay the price for the cineama if it is crap then why bother handing over the money.

It will inspre the film makers to make only good films (hopefully)
 

Xenos

New Member
Aug 16, 2002
162
0
0
South London/Surrey
Visit site
Yeh I agree, if they just made the music downloadable for like 10p a track at perfect quality with good speed then I'm sure a lot of people would pay for it. It'd be good for everyone and they would have nothing to moan about.
 

Tom Tom

Damn you ALL
Jul 27, 2001
1,157
3
63
46
Waterlooville
www.thinkingfortuesday.com
Originally posted by manike
Do you think that is going to help the music industry?

I think it's the wrong course of action.

If they made music available on line but charged for downloads that would be a better course of action in my opinion.

They could legitimately charge less for the songs because they don't have to do all the hard copies and distribution etc. I think then more people would pay for the music and everyone would be happier.

We could also just buy the songs we are interested in.
If the record compaines produce the Kazaa type downloaders and charged £20 a year for the privalage you could share files like before and you would not have to worry about the legality of it
 

manike

INCEPTIONDESIGNS.COM
Jul 9, 2001
3,064
10
63
Cloud 9
www.inceptiondesigns.com
Originally posted by Tom Tom
If the record compaines produce the Kazaa type downloaders and charged £20 a year for the privalage you could share files like before and you would not have to worry about the legality of it
I would pay more than £20 a year for that.

I would be willing to pay 50p to a £1 for each song I download in high quality. At that rate the record industry would probably make more money from me than they do now.

You could have low quality clipped 'tasters' just to try something out, and then have to pay if you want a decent copy to listen to. That would work fine. It would allow people to try stuff but pay if they really want to hear the full/quality version.
 
Being a Mac user...

Apple's iTunes music store is a great idea - 99 cents for tracks - so you just buy what you want.

only problem is only available in the U.S. (will be available rest of world at some point) - and only for the Mac (will be availiable for Windows users soon also).

These 2 things have greatly hampered it's acceptance - hell imagine how many songs they would have sold by now...


goose
 

Philip

Whip it out..
Mar 24, 2002
3,040
12
63
Ellesmere Port
www.boycott-riaa.com have the truths, lies and facts.

In 1999 music sales were up 11% not down
Testimony of Hank Barry quoting a RIAA survey
Chief Executive Officer
Napster, Inc.
Before the Senate Judiciary Committee

In the first quarter of 2000 music sales are up 8% over last year
Testimony of Hank Barry
Chief Executive Officer
Napster, Inc.
Before the Senate Judiciary Committee

During the boom of file sharing.

Now i am somewhat of a file sharer, but have my personal reasons, mostly staggered release on anything. C'mon, if they are releasing it in one country first, surely they are expecting for piracy to happen. And until everything is worldwide release im gonna keep downloading. Im happy with the prices, i dont think they are bad, but i still have a hate for the staggered release.

Philip(almost onto my second 80gb hdd ;) )