Is that any way to talk to one of your fellow countrymen?Originally posted by McD
I'd love to cut your balls off
As to the squabble over who paid for what and what it means in the great scope of PBall on TV it's all good, kids. Some peeps got agendas, some got ill-informed opinions, some are curious, some are anarachists and trouble-makers, etc. Nothing amiss with setting the record straight but at the same time it's not quite earth shaking news if somebody accepts some measure of inaccurate jabber as the truth.
As it stands now pretty much all Pball on Tv is supported and paid for directly or indirectly by Pball. If that, in large measure, also proves to be true of the ESPN2/NXL programs it's not really important. What matters is what comes next. What ITN left out of the 68 Cal report was the financial and business tie-in with DC who also has some stake in the proceedings. Will it matter? Who knows.
In the meantime, stay tuned--same bat time, same bat channel. (And no, I didn't need to watch TVLand for my knowledge of ancient television trivia.)