Originally posted by Robbo
Are you targetting NXL teams for the EXL-2004 ?
If so, are you planning for them to come across regularly ?
Same questions applies to teams like Dynasty, Dogs, BC etc
First of all, we all know that the whole EXL is up in the air now so no one can say with 100% cetainty that there will be an EXL. But I've already said that Procaps apparently have a plan for one.
Yes, we in the Millennium organization are trying to come up with a program that will make it possible and attractive for NXL teams to come over and participate. Ditto the top teams in the world outside of NXL, including the teams we've named. "Planning" would not be the right word. Hoping that we can be successul is a better way of putting it. And I have said countless times
ad nauseum we MIGHT BE pull it off, we MIGHT NOT. Remains to be seen.
Originally posted by Robbo
Now if your answer is 'yes' (which you don't have to have any concrete plans to answer) how do you then answer the financial problems they will encounter that I have already highlighted ?
And if you have contacted any of the US teams with regard to 2004 EXL, which specific ones ?
The financial aspects you mention have certainly been a big part of these discussions.
I haven't formally contacted any team. I've only had loose discussions myself and I know that the real decision-makers in Millennium have talked or had some serious discussion with many of the teams about Season 2004.
I understand that as a journalist and as the coach or manager of Nexus that you want to know what the program is for 2004, and that you must press the hard questions.
Since I am basically just an implementer of the Millennium board's policies, I am not in a position to publicize all the details of preliminary discussions about anything, very much like a manager or deputy director in IBM certainly isn't going to have the minutes of board meetings and stategic management meetings open to on-going scrutiny. Hell, nothing would ever get done and everyone would be reluctant to say anything.
But I will excercise my freedom to discuss issues and talk about general intentions. Whether or not I can discuss ideas or get feedback here depends on how you handle my attempts to answer honest questions with honest answers.
Originally posted by Robbo
I mean, Steve, don't keep tellin eveyrbody at every opportunity here that you are 'da man', the EXL man, the man in the seat......
Could you please "proof-text" any place on this forum or anywhere else where I have said "I am 'da man', the EXL man, the man in the seat." I have made it ridiculously clear that I DON'T MAKE THE DECISIONS. I DON'T NEGOTIATE WITH RICHMOND ITALIA. I JUST TAKE THE BOARD'S POLICIES AND TRY TO IMPLEMENT THEM, including trying to get ideas and feedback.
Originally posted by Robbo
and you ain't answered one damn questoin regarding what you propose for next season.
Now please answer my questions.
Again, let's be careful with words. "Propose" is what I do and have done here and on various other fora. My "proposals" for better judging, better rules, an improved playing format or whatever are just like any other jack's discussions. They don't mean jack-**** until someone decides to make them policy. I just happen to be in a position to talk with some key people about any ideas I may have, whenever they have time or inclination to listen. Whether they pay them any more attention than a squeaky door is up to them.
I am honestly trying to answer your questions, but I am not at liberty to always say anything or everything I hear or see. That's pretty standard fare in the world of business or politics. And that off course, makes it easy for detractors to say it's bull**** or smokescreen.
C'est la vie.
And a journalist's job is to press anyone that is availble in the public for answers, to investigate matters and to cut through bull**** to reveal truth. You have a responsibity to your readership.
C'est la vie.
Making some definite decisions certainly can't be easy for the Mill board members. In many ways it is a more complex set of circumstances than 1 year ago. We certainly can't expect them to shoot from the hip. Some very serious matters need to be looked into and there continues to be a lot of turmoil in the air. So they have to balance the need to get a program moving and the need to not announce the wrong program and make a catastrophic mistake. Frying pan or fire.
POST EDIT: It's not like the board members sit around discussing policy in some office. They live in different countries, are up to their ears in at least one or two major enterprises and don't always see eye-to-eye on policy.
Any DEFINITE POLICIES and definite proposals, when they're decided, will be made clear to be such and will be easily identifiable as such.
And we certainly don't imply that we're under any obligation to make our official announcements here.