Do we?I think they made a pretty fair effort (compared to last year's Campaign) at Basildon but once again compromised some of what should be high priorities and this event seems to have regressed somewhat .....
Still, you get what you pay for, don't you?
When we compare it to good events, like the German event (I wasn't there, but I heard it was good), do we not see that a better result was achieved, with the same amounts (ish) of money coming in?
It shouldn't be the case of 'when you pay peanuts, you get monkeys' with this (which we all understand), because the price seems fairly fair already.
But then again, I'm not behind the scenes so I don't know- should we be paying more for this? -Is it the fact that we aren't giving them enough money that ties their hands (especially where the events are situated)?