Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

airsoft pisses on paintball

Baca Loco

Ex-Fun Police
Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by rancid
Hey great, we're still going.

Originally posted by Baca Loco
My point is simple. The existing player base was in large part introduced to the game as a war-type game (and apparently in the UK still is.) If they had been introduced from the beginning of their experience to a tourney-type game we would not be having this discussion.

A--No, we wouldn't - because there would be no such thing as paintball. ie tournament paintball is not the panacea many would have us believe - it is alienating, it is elitist, it is competitive and it is therefore less attractive and limited.

B--That's a bit bolshy of me, cos I must say that I'm out the loop editorially these days, and my knowledge of grassroots US paintball isn't what it should be.

And that is what is beginning to happen over here. The tourney scene is big enough, the numbers of tourney players pervasive enough, the marketing of all of paintball uses the tourney focus to promote their products. Consequently what is beginning to happen is new players are exposed from the beginning to a non-wargame scenario focused game and coming into the game with a slowly changing perception of what paintball is and what they want to play.

C--You've posted a few times recently to this effect....but I'd like to push you on evidence. When you say the players are forcing change where? how? why? and what makes them right? Who are these pioneers?

D--Maybe this can really work in the US, and ten minutes of TV supair will bring more people to the sites that ten minutes of TV 'storm the castle', I don't know. But my gut feeling is that this is all Emperor's New Clothes, and it will prove to be nothing more than an expensive glitch. And in ten years when we're still talking about tv tomorrow, we'll look behind us to find the grass roots has diminished, and the sites have disappeared, and the paint production has polarised, and you're back to having a choice of two guns and they're both sold by the same company.

And, I'll still be driving an old banger...with Hotpoint in the boot. :)
Rancid--just because you still live in a hobbit hole in some nondescript hedgerow doesn't mean the rest of the world does too.
A--at one level yes but just like kids play baseball, basketball and football it is both like and unlike the highest levels of competition and there's no reason paintball can't and won't end up somewhat similarly. (Tho there will probably always be some segment that prefers Big Games and woods-style ball and so what.)
B--SEE hobbit hole remark. :)
C--Obviously I can speak with the most authority about Florida so that's my frame of reference. So, in order, Florida, with their playing dollars, because they want to play the game they read about in the magazines and other players talk about, right and wrong have nothing to do with it, the active, established player base and the young players coming into the game with NO PRECONCEPTIONS.
D--the glass is half full. :rolleyes:


Hotpoint--it's a matter of degree and our government hasn't yet reached the critical mass of central authority bureaucrats whereas the EU is nothing but self-aggrandizing, we-know-better-than you-do-what's-good-for-you apparatchiks who think nationalism and it's vestiges of patriotism are part and parcel of Europe's problems and must be stamped out. :D But I could be wrong.
American Civil War--people willing to fight for what they believed in. Chamberlain and appeasement in the face of anchluss. Mmmm?
 

Hotpoint

Pompey Paintballer
Re: Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by Baca Loco

whereas the EU is nothing but self-aggrandizing, we-know-better-than you-do-what's-good-for-you apparatchiks who think nationalism and it's vestiges of patriotism are part and parcel of Europe's problems and must be stamped out. :D But I could be wrong.
American Civil War--people willing to fight for what they believed in. Chamberlain and appeasement in the face of anchluss. Mmmm?
Hey it's not for me to make comment on whether or not the combatants in your Civil War thought they were doing the right thing, the point I was making is that one side (the losers) were acting upon the instincts of "rugged independance" and it was not in their interests to do so especially when it ended up with Sherman marching to the sea burning everything in sight

People attack Chamberlain because he was wrong but it should be pointed out that he thought he was doing the right thing too which is apparently a reasonable defence in your eyes :p

Hey we've covered the US Civil War and WWII. Can we do the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 now please... I enjoy history discussions a great deal ;)

Actually despite the media image most EU "bureaucrats" I've met are nothing like they are portrayed. For the most part they are far more democratic by inclination than the people involved in the various national governments. Also you do meet a lot of patriots amongst them it's just they are European patriots as well

Hmmm thread hijacking in progress methinks. I offer my humble apologies to you all

Anyhow - Paintball Good, AirSoft Bad
 

Baca Loco

Ex-Fun Police
Re: Re: Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by Hotpoint

A--the point I was making is that one side (the losers) were acting upon the instincts of "rugged independance"

B--People attack Chamberlain because he was wrong but it should be pointed out that he thought he was doing the right thing too which is apparently a reasonable defence in your eyes :p

C--Hey we've covered the US Civil War and WWII. Can we do the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 now please... I enjoy history discussions a great deal ;)

D--Actually despite the media image most EU "bureaucrats" I've met are nothing like they are portrayed. For the most part they are far more democratic by inclination than the people involved in the various national governments. Also you do meet a lot of patriots amongst them it's just they are European patriots as well

E--Hmmm thread hijacking in progress methinks. I offer my humble apologies to you all

F--Anyhow - Paintball Good, AirSoft Bad
A--sorry, bears not even a superficial resemblance to reality.
B--I didn't reference right or wrong. My point was about recognizing reality for what it is and being willing to deal with it up to and including necessary conflict.
C--name the forum and I'm there.
D--if they were, in fact, far more democratic by inclination they would philosophically object to how they achieved their present status. And "European patriots" is a mind game, which actually reinforces my point of view.
E--like anybody but us (and Rancid) is reading this anyway. :)
F--tru dat
 

Hotpoint

Pompey Paintballer
Re: Re: Re: Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by Baca Loco

A--sorry, bears not even a superficial resemblance to reality.
B--I didn't reference right or wrong. My point was about recognizing reality for what it is and being willing to deal with it up to and including necessary conflict.
C--name the forum and I'm there.
D--if they were, in fact, far more democratic by inclination they would philosophically object to how they achieved their present status. And "European patriots" is a mind game, which actually reinforces my point of view.
E--like anybody but us (and Rancid) is reading this anyway. :)
F--tru dat
A--Depends on how you view the concept of "States Rights" I would say it is predicated by a notion of independence from (higher) authority. I do realise however that when asked the majority of Confederates, when asked why they were fighting by Union Troops, would reply with "Because you're down here" rather than a high-minded notion of regional independence
B--I would have thought that given your statement "people willing to fight for what they believed in" would imply they would invariably think they were "right" to do so and the opposition was wrong. I didn't mean the objective morals but rather the subjective
C--I'll look around and get back to you
D--Actually most of them think of themselves as laying the initial structural groundwork required for a Federal System (Civil Service etc). It is interesting to note that when the idea of a directly elected EU President was mooted earlier this year it was more deeply supported by the "Bureaucrats" than the national governments who saw it as a threat to their own power. It is also a fact that it is very much the policy of the member states to limit the legislative scope of the (Elected) European Parliament
E--You may be right. Do you think if we go on long enough Rancid will clear off too and we can declare victory on the AirSoft issue?
F--Nice to know we agree on something :)

Nb. All nationalism or patriotism is a mind game being simply an extension of the pack-instinct still lurking deep in our DNA. I am both a Subject of Her Majesty and a Citizen of the European Union and am proud to be both, that I am so is no more or less ephemeral than putting your hand on your heart and enthusiastically signing the Star Spangled Banner whilst "Old Glory" is raised overhead

Hotpoint - Proud to live under both the Union Jack and the Gold Stars on Blue of Europe :)
 

Baca Loco

Ex-Fun Police
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by Hotpoint


A--Depends on how you view the concept of "States Rights" I would say it is predicated by a notion of independence from (higher) authority. I do realise however that when asked the majority of Confederates, when asked why they were fighting by Union Troops, would reply with "Because you're down here" rather than a high-minded notion of regional independence
B--I would have thought that given your statement "people willing to fight for what they believed in" would imply they would invariably think they were "right" to do so and the opposition was wrong. I didn't mean the objective morals but rather the subjective
C--I'll look around and get back to you
D--Actually most of them think of themselves as laying the initial structural groundwork required for a Federal System (Civil Service etc). It is interesting to note that when the idea of a directly elected EU President was mooted earlier this year it was more deeply supported by the "Bureaucrats" than the national governments who saw it as a threat to their own power. It is also a fact that it is very much the policy of the member states to limit the legislative scope of the (Elected) European Parliament
E--You may be right. Do you think if we go on long enough Rancid will clear off too and we can declare victory on the AirSoft issue?
F--Nice to know we agree on something :)

Nb. All nationalism or patriotism is a mind game being simply an extension of the pack-instinct still lurking deep in our DNA. I am both a Subject of Her Majesty and a Citizen of the European Union and am proud to be both, that I am so is no more or less ephemeral than putting your hand on your heart and enthusiastically signing the Star Spangled Banner whilst "Old Glory" is raised overhead

Hotpoint - Proud to live under both the Union Jack and the Gold Stars on Blue of Europe :)
A--fair enough
B--again fair enough but you made the judgement personal (but not offensive) to make a point.
C--:)
D--couldn't care less what they profess to think. The problem is you agree with them. The other problem is the more removed from the real lives of ordinary people and the more layers of bureaucracy that is built up the less responsive and less interested government becomes. That and of course, all of modern history's greatest crimes have been perpetuated by the appartuses of the state.
E-- Yes, he'll get bored and start a thread advocating the banning of inflatable bunkers. :D

Nationalism and patriotism are not by definition xenophobic or jingoistic. Being a Brit has a history and encompasses a culture. Being a citizen of Europe may be a broad geographical fact but it's a modern construct. Now if you want to argue the long term "civilizing" trend of larger and larger inclusive bodies I'll buy that argument.
But on the whole I'm wary of too much power over too many assigned to too few. Regardless of country.
 

Hotpoint

Pompey Paintballer
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Perception is reality

Originally posted by Baca Loco

A--fair enough
B--again fair enough but you made the judgement personal (but not offensive) to make a point.
C--:)
D--couldn't care less what they profess to think. The problem is you agree with them. The other problem is the more removed from the real lives of ordinary people and the more layers of bureaucracy that is built up the less responsive and less interested government becomes. That and of course, all of modern history's greatest crimes have been perpetuated by the appartuses of the state.
E-- Yes, he'll get bored and start a thread advocating the banning of inflatable bunkers. :D

Nationalism and patriotism are not by definition xenophobic or jingoistic. Being a Brit has a history and encompasses a culture. Being a citizen of Europe may be a broad geographical fact but it's a modern construct. Now if you want to argue the long term "civilizing" trend of larger and larger inclusive bodies I'll buy that argument.
But on the whole I'm wary of too much power over too many assigned to too few. Regardless of country.
A + B + C -- Nice to see this remaining amicable Baca (and I'm still looking for a History Board not populated by conspiracy nuts :)

D -- I agree with their professed goals not necessarily the situation we're in now. I would personally prefer the European Parliament to take on most of the Commisions powers and the Council of Ministers executive powers to be transfered to an elected President

E -- LOL :D

I think of the EU as being psychologically at the level of development of the 13 Colonies in say the 1750's or '60's. There is an identity there as being something (American or European) but not yet a nation. As a citizen of a famous, and successful, construct perhaps you can see the parallels?

The answer for Europe is a Federal State based on principles of subsidiarity (power to be placed at the level to which it is best kept be that local, regional, national or Europe wide)

You may be surprised to hear that I heartily agree with you about limiting the power of the state btw. My political inclination is philosophically liberal (in the European sense rather than the American where it appears to infer socialism) and as such I view the state as a necessary evil rather than something to be worshipped
 

Baca Loco

Ex-Fun Police
Perception is reality

Originally posted by Hotpoint
I'm still looking for a History Board not populated by conspiracy nuts :)

D -- I agree with their professed goals not necessarily the situation we're in now. I would personally prefer the European Parliament to take on most of the Commisions powers and the Council of Ministers executive powers to be transfered to an elected President

E -- LOL :D

1---I think of the EU as being psychologically at the level of development of the 13 Colonies in say the 1750's or '60's. There is an identity there as being something (American or European) but not yet a nation. As a citizen of a famous, and successful, construct perhaps you can see the parallels?

2---The answer for Europe is a Federal State based on principles of subsidiarity (power to be placed at the level to which it is best kept be that local, regional, national or Europe wide)

3---You may be surprised to hear that I heartily agree with you about limiting the power of the state btw. My political inclination is philosophically liberal (in the European sense rather than the American where it appears to infer socialism) and as such I view the state as a necessary evil rather than something to be worshipped
And there's a problem with conspiracy nuts? :D
1--I sorta figured that and yes, intellectually I have no problem with it but there are some dramatic and important differences. And even in our case what you are seeing now is less and less an homologous union and something potentially approaching Balkanization.
2--and yet the greater power tends to draw more and more power unto itself in a variety of seemingly good and well-intentioned rationales.
3--well, we can agree its necessary but perhaps we diverge on just how evil. :)


Originally posted by Tyger
Oh to hell with it. Why do I try?
Not ignoring you, Tyg, but you were still responding to Rancid and Hotpoint and I wandered away from that debate awhile ago. Hop in anytime. :)