Aaron, I agree with what you are saying in that the area in which the 7 man Toulouse does excel, (1000% excel by the way) is the number of teams represented and that is why I previously quaified what I thought the word 'world' signified.Originally posted by Chicago
On the scale of "entitlement to the title 'world'".
WPL and 7-man World Cup draw from about the same population size and geographic area - one continent and 450-500 million each.
Even just looking in paintball, 7-man World Cup is much closer to WPL than regular World Cup, which draws teams from 5 continents and many more countries.
On the sporting scale, it's much, much closer to WPL than the Olympics, or Football World Cup, which draws teams from almost all countries and 6 continents.
The only thing 7-man world cup has going for it over WPL is number of countries. If WPL went and got teams from mexico, belize, costa rica, el salvador, panama, honduras, guatamala and nicaragua, would they be able to call themselves "World" then in your estimation? What's the number of countries you need? How about north and south america, that would be more than 7-man World Cup.
Now this discussion can run around the maypole of debate a million times if we are using different assignations of meaning for the word 'world'.
All the time you consider the word 'world' to mean qualititve or geographical and I am using the world 'world' to represent number of countries then we will eventually disappear up each other's ******* in a cloud of nonsense.
And on that note, if you persist in defining it in qualitive terms, good luck to you mate because it ain't what I understatnd it to mean and seems more like a convenient device to extend this debate when it should have ended about 5 posts ago.
Peace !
PS, I still think you are quite bright Aaron but maybe a bit Brockdorff'ish
No offence Nick !