Originally posted by Bush
if the moments there, take it. its all bout the game, if it was up 2 u, then y are there marshals on that field
Not flaming, just my Point of view...
I have judged all types of events including many Pro Millenium finals and I have always been of the view that the Marshals are there to help the FLOW of the game. It would be best if we never had to get in and do anything and the game could play itself. I dont think anyone can honestly say that it's the reponsibilty of the judge to remove the player??!! If we go down that lane, then wow, what's going to happen next? If the player is bigger and more aggressive than the unarmed judge and he doesnt want to leave, is it the Marshals fault for not being able to beat him off the field? Do we honestly want to play against a team that wont leave the field until they are dragged off? How frustrating!
People often moan when judges have to get involved in game decisions (who was hit first, were they playing on etc etc) but at the end of the day the Marshal is not commiting an offence by making the wrong decision, they player is by cheating.
The real top players are easy to judge. They're so good they don't get hit, and if they do they are often graceful enough to admit it and leave with their dignity.
Judges are there to JUDGE and help enforce the rules. If it's "all about the game" then it's a different game we're talking about because in paintball you are out once you're hit. It would be like using your hands in football. It's cheating and if everyone can do it then it becomes a different game. (Not sure what, and don't say rugby!)