That would mean a massive increase in the number of "pro" teams, many of which wouldn't really be up to the job & therefore just lowering the standard of that division. You're also proposing a very big increase in the number of Ams, & this is a year-on-year increase. I think 8 & 16 is way too many in the current climate, though I'll accept Shuck's suggestion of 5 rather than 2 or 3 is reasonable at each level.Originally posted by Glorykid
i'll make it easier top eight ams should go pro
top 16 novice should go Am
thats after the whole series by the way.
Originally posted by RON
the Millennium seires needs to have amature A and amature B as at the moment there are far to many novice teams, each event has nearly half novice teams. if there is going to be a progression make novice as it says novice. which it is not as it is atm. i know this will bring its own problems but the Millennium sieres has grown faster than it percieved possible and with out restructure it will cuase problems in the future. why should teams play novice when they know 1/3 of those teams should not be playing at novice.
if u dont have amature b u will just end up with a huge pool of amature players in years to come.
From what I can gather, the increased cost at higher levels is because you can win financial prizes and kit if you finish on the podium at these 'higher levels'. Thats one suggestion, and also you are playing a higher class of teams. I am not saying that these suggestions are right, and that I agree with them, but thats why I think you may have to pay more to enter.Originally posted by Paul_collier
why should it cost more to enter at a higher level?