Robbo, I'm not actually talking about anything that has gone on before, I'm talking about a generalization of the rules. I'm not talking about anything that happened at a Millennium event.
Apologies if we got our wires crossed, I won't comment on the Millennium situation, as I wasn't there to see it happen.
I just see teams getting away with cheating, and I don't like it.
The point I was trying to make, was that if a team suffers, then they will do something about the guilty player. If the team doesn't suffer, there is no incentive to punish the guilty.
I think we both agree that has to happen, we just want it to happen in different ways. Unfortunatly, I don't see a team ditching a good player (who also cheats) if they penalties levied against them are small.
Apologies if we got our wires crossed, I won't comment on the Millennium situation, as I wasn't there to see it happen.
I just see teams getting away with cheating, and I don't like it.
The point I was trying to make, was that if a team suffers, then they will do something about the guilty player. If the team doesn't suffer, there is no incentive to punish the guilty.
I think we both agree that has to happen, we just want it to happen in different ways. Unfortunatly, I don't see a team ditching a good player (who also cheats) if they penalties levied against them are small.