Originally posted by mikeyR
"The Gardners know that by growing the sport they will be growing their business. Because they're involved with so many different aspects of the sport at such a high level, the decisions that Billy and Adam make will eventually filter down to affect us all." Too right it effects us!
or more importantly healthy business competition. Did they hint at something when they did this interview that PGI glossed over? How come no one from PGI has made comment on here regarding the article or defended them even?
What do you mean no one? I can count three staff writers on this thread.
They might have more of an insight into what the Gardners had in mind? Or is this a classic case of a magazine (on a tight budget) not wishing to offend one of its advertisers ( 3 pages this month)?
Offend people by saying what? Repeating all the scuttlebutt? Fact is, as mark or Dnwarf said earlier, this has been common knowledge in the industyry for the last two/three years or so. As far as I know, this has only come to a head in the last week. That article with the Gardeners was conducted, what, over a month ago.
Joe Carter wrote the article, any response, even to tell me to stop being paranoid?
Mikey, paranoid about what? Whether this is real or not? Or the extent to which it could be pushed? I think it's fair to say that pgi knows no more than anyone else.
"The Gardners know that by growing the sport they will be growing their business. Because they're involved with so many different aspects of the sport at such a high level, the decisions that Billy and Adam make will eventually filter down to affect us all." Too right it effects us!
or more importantly healthy business competition. Did they hint at something when they did this interview that PGI glossed over? How come no one from PGI has made comment on here regarding the article or defended them even? What do you mean no one? I can count three staff writers on this thread.
They might have more of an insight into what the Gardners had in mind? Or is this a classic case of a magazine (on a tight budget) not wishing to offend one of its advertisers ( 3 pages this month)?
Offend people by saying what? Repeating all the scuttlebutt? Fact is, as mark or Dnwarf said earlier, this has been common knowledge in the industyry for the last two/three years or so. As far as I know, this has only come to a head in the last week. That article with the Gardeners was conducted, what, over a month ago.
Joe Carter wrote the article, any response, even to tell me to stop being paranoid?
Mikey, paranoid about what? Whether this is real or not? Or the extent to which it could be pushed? I think it's fair to say that pgi knows no more than anyone else.
