And now for something completely different...
In the same way as with the hot gun issue we discussed before don't you think that the player should do this before they are being checked by a marshal or before the game is over? If so then we have just hit the nail on the head of what I am getting on about. And my whole issue here.
manike
That Goose is exactly the thoughts I wanted to get from people when I asked my first question about at what point it becomes an issue. We need to sort out issues like this in our sport. I hope with thoughts like this that some good comes from all this mess. I tried to find you at Portugal but didn't. I shall try harder next time.Originally posted by goose
... well okay not really, but this whole discussion brings one question to mind.
Nowhere in the rules is there any provision for a player, who discovers that his marker is malfunctioning, be able to remove himself from the game without being penalized/suspended form the tournament.
What I would like to see is a section that says something along the lines of:
If at anytime during the course of a game, a player notices his marker behaving in a manner that is contradictory to the rules, they will be allowed to remove themselves from the game without further penalty to the team or player. The player is then responsible for correcting the problem before the nest game.
Just some food for thought.
goose
In the same way as with the hot gun issue we discussed before don't you think that the player should do this before they are being checked by a marshal or before the game is over? If so then we have just hit the nail on the head of what I am getting on about. And my whole issue here.
Pete haven't you answered your own guestion there?Originally posted by Robbo
... do you believe the RL knowingly went on to the field of play, fully aware that their guns were affected (or could potentially malfunction) by what they had only heard about happening with some other guns with regard to misfiring
manike