R
raehl
Guest
No, it's kinda like saying that the chief executive of a player's association/union shouldn't be a player. And that's standard practice - you let the players play, and you hire someone else to administer the organization whose primary expertise is administration, not play.Originally posted by Buddha 3
Meaning it's for and by the players. Would be kinda silly if Goose didn't play, wouldn't it? Kinda like saying that people that run a consumer's rights organisation should not be allowed to consume.
BTW, NPPL is a player's organization.
I'm just as lazy.And since I'm too lazy to look it up myself, where does it say in the rules that coaches/whatevers should not be allowed on teh field after a game?
- Chris