Originally posted by Steve Morris
Unfortunately the crises in the former Yugoslavia proved that Europe couldn't take care of business in its own back yard so we had to get involved in Bosnia-Herzegovina after the Euros stood by (literally in the case of one infamous incident involving Dutch "peacekeepers"; was it Banjeluka?) with their thumbs out of daylight. Then again in Kosovo.
That would have been Srebrenica.
As a little aside, the peacekeepers themselves were not to blame. As usual the fingers should be pointed at the government. The guys with the cute blue hats were quite willing to go tear and kick ass when the Serbs moved on the enclave, but they were not allowed to. The Dutch government sent them over with a totally unrealistic mandate. Because they felt they were there with a peacekeeping role, the Dutch soldiers should not display too violent an image. For this reason no tanks or other heavy weapons were sent over. The biggest thing they had was an YPR infantry fighting vehicle. Because of the reasons above they even had the turrets with the 25mm cannon removed, and replaced with a cupola mounted .50 M2 machine gun...
Basically spit wads when the Serbs moved in with T55's, which are tanks that are old as hell, but will blow the crap out of a disarmed YPR.
For some reason many western European countries are reluctant to deploy their full military might. Situations such as Bosnia and Kosovo could have easily been handled without the US joining in. But for some reason the US seems to be one of the few countries left that doesn't seem to mind it's young'uns getting killed...
About that economy thing, yes the EU as it is blows chunks, particularly for the Dutch, as we pay the largest contribution to Brussels of all the EU member states. But I think the US economy is in for a harder time than we are, particularly should the dollar plunge even further and the Euro would suddenly cost $1.40 or more.
My predictions for the next superpowers: China and India... Get used to it.