Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Pa Has Taken All Teams that dropped out to court, (EDITED DUE TO MISREAD BY SOMEONE)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Parksy

Platinum Member
Oct 27, 2002
2,652
20
73
47
Newcastle, UK
Originally posted by Beaker
Has this made the PA forums instead?
Come on... do you expect a thread like this to actually escape the censors? :)

This is nearly a sad enough topic to make it onto Judge Judy though...
 
This is prime judge judy material! Thats where this shuld all be settled. Maybe its a case for the people versus?

Either way it quite clearly shows the depths to whch people will sink to when money is involved. Am i also right in thinking that this isnt the first time the PA has tried to use crap legal advice?
 

Ben Frain

twit twoo
Sep 7, 2002
1,823
0
0
In a tree
Originally posted by Parksy
Come on... do you expect a thread like this to actually escape the censors? :)
I am a 'censor' on the PA boards - no thread exists there or has done yet on that topic, anyone who wishes to do so is fine by me to.
 

Matski

SO hot right now
Aug 8, 2001
1,737
0
0
Originally posted by duffistuta
I suggest all affected teams hire Judge John Deed.
Screw that ol fart. Ally McBeal never loses and folds neatly into most kit bags.
 

Raffles

Going....going....not quite dead yet...
Jun 21, 2004
2,766
1
63
57
oldham - lancs
Well, it's refreshing to see that I am not the only person being threatened with legal action by the PA and its representatives :rolleyes:

Surely, the PA knows that the main reason teams left the tourney in the first place was due to the cost (not just entry - but the fact that tourneys cost a lot of time and money to all those involved). Trying to take even more money off a team smacks of capitalism to me (just like banks that charge you £35 for knocking back a £10 DD - then charge you for being £35 over-drawn!).

I can see the PA's point - it costs money to set up tourneys - and you need to re-coup your losses somewhere - perhaps a % non-returnable deposit would have been a better idea?

There is NO real money in UK paintball - so why do people insist on trying to take what little bit there is?

Maybe instead of teams trying to improve their paintball skills etc. - they should take up a SPORT that has real rewards - and actually costs a lot less to play (a cheap football is only 99p!).

This way - we can all be friends again - and that lovely Americanistic word "sue" shall never rear it's ugly head again. Oh sorry, I took a trip to fantasy land then...

That death-nell of UK paintball is getting even louder and more frequent. Forget ramping, petty in-fighting, personal issues and now forget that replica firearms bill - we are just killing ourselves!

Paintball as a recoginsed sport in the UK? I think it's time we all woke up and smelled the cappcino! It is NEVER going to happen at this rate. It is going to remain nothing more than a VERY expensive hobby - with less and less people playing it.

So, this is not so much the death of the PA - more the lowering of that axe hovvering over UK paintballs head.
 

Parksy

Platinum Member
Oct 27, 2002
2,652
20
73
47
Newcastle, UK
Originally posted by Ben Frain
I am a 'censor' on the PA boards - no thread exists there or has done yet on that topic, anyone who wishes to do so is fine by me to.
Come on Ben... there is a big difference between a moderator and a censor :)
 

Ben Frain

twit twoo
Sep 7, 2002
1,823
0
0
In a tree
Originally posted by Raffles
I can see the PA's point - it costs money to set up tourneys - and you need to re-coup your losses somewhere - perhaps a % non-returnable deposit would have been a better idea?
Good idea Raffles, that would have made far more sense I think. Nice, clean, simple.
 

Ben Frain

twit twoo
Sep 7, 2002
1,823
0
0
In a tree
Originally posted by Parksy
Come on Ben... there is a big difference between a moderator and a censor :)
Sorry Dave, don't get what you mean? Anything dodgy goes on the PA board it is usually me or Ian Burke who removes it.

What else do you mean?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.