The drug analogy will work. We can even use prostitution as an example. Compare the crime rate in countries where it is illegal to those that have made it legal. There is a major difference. What I'm saying is instead focusing all of ones energy into trying to prevent something that is increasingly becoming more and more difficult to regulate, why not concentrate more in doing things that will discourage it, such as paint limits. I understand your counterpoint. Safety is paramount and we the players, the manufactors, and the governing bodies should never forget that.
I do agree with you (as far as placing tight controls on equipment), however, just to set the record straight, I don't have a problem FA or turbo type configurations. Ramping velocities, yes. I don't see a need for it. But what is the difference in fanning a trigger enabling the marker to shoot 17-20 bps and holding a trigger to do the same? Regardless of the "skill factor" in pulling a trigger, 18 bps is still 18bps. It still feels the same.
So, I'll compromise. Tighter controls on euipment (for everyone, including top teams the world over) to prevent velocity issues, etc. Allow, FA or turbo type boards back into the markers. Plus, mandate a specified quantity of paint that is allowed onto the field.
I do agree with you (as far as placing tight controls on equipment), however, just to set the record straight, I don't have a problem FA or turbo type configurations. Ramping velocities, yes. I don't see a need for it. But what is the difference in fanning a trigger enabling the marker to shoot 17-20 bps and holding a trigger to do the same? Regardless of the "skill factor" in pulling a trigger, 18 bps is still 18bps. It still feels the same.
So, I'll compromise. Tighter controls on euipment (for everyone, including top teams the world over) to prevent velocity issues, etc. Allow, FA or turbo type boards back into the markers. Plus, mandate a specified quantity of paint that is allowed onto the field.