Loyalty inspired myopia. It's almost heart-warming. And, yes, I've busted out the numbers. Look out.Originally posted by Furby
1--I'm afraid we'll have to agree to disagree, sir. A mid-day time slot on ESPN 8 (The OCHO!) showing second line videography and voiceover may get the numbers for that time slot and perhaps meet what were probably modest goals,
2--but the fact remains that it's still second line product compared to what the NPPL is producing, and even the independant video producers are doing a better job, IMHO.
3--You'll note that both leagues are using highlights, not entire games, due to the large number of teams and/or time constraints, so the argument that a 'magazine' format vs. 'real' sports coverage doesn't really wash in my mind. There's no way the NXL presentation could have included the ENTIRE game due to time constraints, so some editing was to be expected.
4--Due to the large number of teams attending NPPL events vs. NXL matches, there's no way Chuck and Co. could ever show a large enough represenative sample of teams from the various divisions to make it 'complete' coverage. So, they're stuck showing off the superstars and interspersing (sp?) it with 'cool' stuff from Rocky and whoever. The nice thing about the NXL is that just about everyone in that league is of superstar caliber, so they do have the very best to film without having to pick one team or player over another.
5--There's no debating the videography skill differential, NPPL clearly has a leg up in that regard.
6--Now assuming that the NXL powers-that-be are happy with the initial response with the ESPN 8 (THE OCHO) coverage . . .
7--For their sake, I wish the NXL continued success, because I do enjoy watching NXL competition, and I think it would be a setback for the sport if it were to die.
1--Dale, Dale, Dale. Picking out the least likely showing to make what point? Almost all the second tier and foreign language versions of the show were added after the December shows on ESPN2 because of the "success" of the first showings, not buried away on ESPN8 as you seem to imply. And, the only ratings numbers that mattered were the first two shows on ESPN2 December 9th and 16th.
2--d'oh! Does that somehow mean that future shows can't be better? Is it a static universe? A zero sum TV production game? Are PB videographers as rare as white tigers? That is a viable argument for the past, not the future.
3--the difference is one product clearly defines itself. An NXL match is an NXL match and is easily and plainly understood as such whether or not you see every second of play. The traditional tourney has numerous disadvantages built in when it comes to display on TV and they are evident in the shows. Even with the focus on the Pros exclusively the comparison between clips of numerous games reducing the entirety of all those games into a handful of minutes isn't comparable--despite your efforts--to a reduced version of a single match.
4--Exactly. and this is where you separate the two formats TV viability and sporting pretensions. A highlight reel and extended commercial for the platinum sponsors will never be a sporting event no matter how well it is done.
5--this seems to be the only leg of your chair of dispute.
6--Furbs, it's got nothing to do with the happiness of the NXL powers-that-be. It's all about the ESPN powers-that-be and the prospects for commercial viability and the point is, was, and remains that every indication is the show(s) passed that test.
7--at least we agree on something.