Originally posted by drhp
But why ignore the padding issue.
At tha risk of sounding like Robo...
Steve, the implementation of rules is only credible if those rules are both reasonable, rigorous and non ambiguous.
What's the point of banning padding if the rule book does not specify thicknesses of single layers?
It could well be that a company brings out a single layered jersey that is half inch thick.
This eventuality does not attract the designate of 'padding'and therefore would be allowed under current NPPL rules as far as I know.
The limits have to be specific and unambiguous with those limits being derived from a reasonable and fair rationale.
It's no good just slapping an arbitary ban on something without doing the necessary groundwork, it just makes no sense especially if we are trying to be professional about how we conduct our business.
I think common sense has to prevail somewhere along the line and hopefully it will soon enough, some time today I would think
Ignoring - or trying to find a sensible, balanced way to create a rule?