THis is trueSP's aggressive stance would be seen as sensible policy
no one boycott's Sky, or the Sun or any of Murdoch's 'products' shall we say because he has a monopoly, why should SP be any different
With the ion, as an example, SP are actually developing the paintball industry rather than hindering it, with the ion especially, new players are now able to buy a decent marker and have money to spare for paint etc
If the paintball industry had more 'monopolys' like SP then possibly the sport would grow at a fast rate.
Like you say,SP are big in the USA, therefore it is not an oversimplication to state that the reason paintball is 'bigger' over there than it is over here is down to arguably the influence of Smart Parts
I just think its rather harsh to attack a company on a business level where as Bulldog has stated to the rest of the business world SP's move's are a normal practice.
This is just my opinion,wheather you agree or not is up to you
2cence out
Love Matt