Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

How to preserve Paintball in the UK?

How to preserve Paintball in the UK?

  • Keep everything on the down low, don't want to attract unnecessary attention

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • Voluntary marker registration to demonstrate we's responsible individuals

    Votes: 30 26.8%
  • Compulsory registration and governmental licensing to own and/or use a marker

    Votes: 17 15.2%
  • Begin a campaign to educate the public

    Votes: 33 29.5%
  • Ingratiate ourselves with the authorities by informing on unregistered marker owners

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Take to the barricades with public protests

    Votes: 7 6.3%
  • Demand accountability of our elected representatives

    Votes: 2 1.8%
  • Send Bully regular emails demanding to know what he's done lately

    Votes: 4 3.6%
  • Return to our roots, everybody head for the woods

    Votes: 14 12.5%

  • Total voters
    112
  • Poll closed .

youch

Member
Jun 20, 2005
13
0
11
Cheshire
Visit site
PLEASE take the time to read this in FULL,I know most of it will be boring but it should all make sense.As with anything I or others post here,don't take it as gospel...go out and check for yourselves.
The following was posted on an airsoft website and has bearing on this thread.
I had mentioned the impending ban on replica guns some 18 months ago when serious stirrings first started in the halls of power,few people chose to listen.You of course have the option not to listen now and say "Oh it's just DeeDee sounding off cr@p again" and ignore me if you like,they are your guns and your potential loss if your wrong!

Humm well after my post last week regarding making another G11 but in bright dayglo green I set about digging out some left over parts from the last small batch of electric versions I did 18 months ago or so.
It all made reasonable sense to me,looking at the new proposed laws so long as it didn't look like a "known" firearm aka if Joe Public didn't recognise it as a gun there may well be some lea way if and when the new laws come into force.
All seemed to be going well then my mobile rings at an unusal time.I won't go into great detail about who it was but suffice to say it was one of the very few people I call a friend and somebody who has worn one of those unelected grey suits mentioned in another thread.After the usual pleasentries and general bemoaning of this VCR bill Chris asked wether I had looked more closely at some of the firearms amendments that had been passed in the last 20 years or so.
Off to the reference section of my now not inconsiderable library on weapons and time to do some reading.

OH DEAR! wish I hadn't bothered.

Can any of you chaps remember a guy by the name of Steve Harper? I crossed paths with Steve some years ago while he was the only guy in the UK able to remove the pins of a Brocock (Saxby & Palmer) pistol and he was sleeving them up into different airgun calibres with multi groove brass liners.Nice chap,a real lateral thinker to who had come up with some real weird airgun designs.Well Steve had quite a thing for Brocock cartridges and was merrily turning out things such as the Aircartridge Pen and Aircartridge Pipe (as in smoking pipe) but all that came to a screaming halt when the following was added to the 1968 firearms act (as ammended)

" Firearms (Dangerous Air Weapons) Rules 1969 (S.I. 1969 No. 47), rr. 2, 3
</si>2.
(1) Subject to paragraph (2) below, rule 3 of these Rules applies to an air weapon (that is to say, an air rifle, air gun or air pistol) -

(a) which is capable of discharging a missile so that the missile has, on being discharged from the muzzle of the weapon, kinetic energy in excess, in the case of an air pistol, of 6ft. 1b, or, in the case of an air weapon other than an air pistol, of 12ft. 1b., or

(b which is disguised as another object.

(2) Rule 3 of these Rules does not apply to a weapon which only falls within paragraph 1(a) above and which is designed for use only when submerged in water.
3. An air weapon to which this Rule applies is hereby declared to be specially dangerous.
[These rules are printed as amended by S.I. 1993 No. 1490. The effect of the 1993 Rules is to include, as specially dangerous, air weapons which have been disguised as other objects.]"

Off to see my legal council to see if this affected my now soon to be bright green G11.

More bad news...IT DOES.

The summation (and I quote directly) was.

"Dave,the bottom line of this VCR means that if it looks like a gun wether a real version of the gun exists or not,it is a replica and hence will be banned" (that we already knew) but the next statement chilled me a little.
"Also if it IS a gun (airweapon,low powered or otherwise)and doesn't look like one it is ALREADY illegal so they have the candle well and truely alight from both ends"

Pay PATICULAR attention to the line that states "Disguised as another object" had this read "disguised as a kitchen sink etc etc" then it probably would not have raised any concern but the wide ranging word "OBJECT" is a little too wide for my liking.I had in mind the thought of making a functional airsoft gun that looked no more menacing than a simple plank of wood but was warned by my councilor that "a plank of wood" could easily legally be defined as "Another object".
I get this gut feeling we are being stiffed every wich way from the middle???

Time for my weekly rant:

On that subject I took the time to read up in the threads John the Brick had posted over on the top paintball forum! I really CANNOT believe such a well founded and experienced bunch of people can be so goddam COMPLACENT in their attitudes!! the entire series of posts appear and read to be "Our guns are markers,we don't use replicas" with a couple of pictures of paintball guns and replica airguns for comparrison thrown in! The attitude is EXACTLY what I said it would be (god I hate being right) "It's not OUR guns this time so we don't care" and "Ours are markers,they don't look like guns anyways".

Well Paintballers,REALITY CHECK TIME!! it doesn't matter 1 jot if YOU think it looks like whatever ,it's what the GENERAL PUBLIC think that will decide convictions.You may think it looks like a space toy...if Joe P thinks it looks like a gun your BORKED.

"Ah yes but ours is a recognised sport"...yes chaps we all know paintball is superior?~? but then again handgun shooting is a goddam OLYMPIC sport and that is STILL BANNED in the UK (for all intents and purposes) so get a grip and realise it is the ENTIRE shooting sports fraternity that is under threat and not just the lowly airsofter.So when we have no guns left and YOUR "sport" is under threat there will likely be 10,000 or so LESS supporters than you would have had if you had exercised a little more foresight.

Rant over:
Kind Regards
Dave

I think what Dave has said boils down to one thing, we are involved and our sport is in danger. How can the top teams continue if they are nolonger able to get the new toys? the latest markers? and don't think you can fly to the states and bring one back as that would be an import.
as for the section on "specially dangerous" I read that as saying no matter how powerful it is (1, 6 or 12 ftlbs) if it is disguised as something else it's illegal.
cmon guys contact your mp and convince them to oppose this bill.

Planet Eclippse and the other paintball retailers this affects you as well as your lively hoods are at stake.
 

Raffles

Going....going....not quite dead yet...
Jun 21, 2004
2,766
1
63
57
oldham - lancs
Mr Youch speaks sense yet again - but as I said - no-one will do anything until it is too late. Only when something DIRECTLY affects them will they do anything (I include myself here).

It appears that this 'Dave' and me (or should that be 'I') agree entirely - if a non-knowing member of the JP (Joe Public) believe it to be a gun - then it is one - simple.

Anyway - time for my third cup of tea and - damn - all out of rich tea :(
 

el_thwatez

Member of DOOM
May 9, 2005
107
0
0
near chesham, bucks
Visit site
Theres always time to do something, but its what to do is the question. I say that because speaking to the people sorting the politics isnt gonna help since they have their minds set on banning replicas anyway.

In fact they try will try and ban anything that can be used as a scapegoat for the people causing trouble; the way i see it its all gonna end up alot like Demolition Man, with all the fun being had underground 'illegally' and everything censored up top.

So what would you (you being anyone) propose we did to help prevent the ban of paintball?
 

Raffles

Going....going....not quite dead yet...
Jun 21, 2004
2,766
1
63
57
oldham - lancs
To be honest - I don't think there is anything we can do. If the government decides to ban it - they will - simple as.

Signing petitions is a waste of time. I am convinced that the guy who takes them in at number 10 - shuts the door - turns around - and turns them in to hamster bedding.

Demonstrations are useless - and do more to harm 'the cause' (eg. fox hunting) than promote it.

You can not educate people that don't want to be educated. The media has seen to that. Why have people been watching Big Brother? To see the 'scandal' - people shouting, fighting and for the sex. Add this to paintball - and even the politiciians will join in :p.

A good tempered - 'jolly hockey sticks' - type of game is boring as hell to watch. For me, the highlight of last year was watching Ronnie (Just So Manc) flipping Pebble in last seasons PA. And look where that got them...

The only person I know who has any sort of links with the 'high-ups' is of course, Sir Bully. If Steve has any ideas as to what we can do - then please let us all know - because at the moment, all we can do is sit and wait - and enjoy our Tetley in peace.
 

youch

Member
Jun 20, 2005
13
0
11
Cheshire
Visit site
They are going to the comitee stage at the moment so the best thing to do would be to get Bully and Ledz (or other retailer) to try either for an excemption or to get the bill modified. technically anyone can try for a place on the comitee all you need to do is ring this number
020-7219-4272.
that way the biased groups (such as MAG and the GCN) will be opposed by articulate people who can argue using reasoned debate. One thing though, whoever goes must bring a sowester as the rabid froth from the GCN could drown you.

interesting point, the GCN have a membership of 5. How have they managed to get such an out of proportion representation?
answer one of 'em is an mp another is his wife.
 

Raffles

Going....going....not quite dead yet...
Jun 21, 2004
2,766
1
63
57
oldham - lancs
hmmm - you don't often get the words 'ledz' and 'articulate' in the same post :p

Anyway - if we are already up against an mp and his mistress - errr - wife - then we are already doomed. Unless anyone knows of a paintballing MP?
 

youch

Member
Jun 20, 2005
13
0
11
Cheshire
Visit site
I'm talking to my MP at the moment (concervative) so I may get some help off him, try your own as well.

I'll tell him you said that Raffles ;)

I'm also in contact with the re-enacters who are also going to be hit by this.
 

youch

Member
Jun 20, 2005
13
0
11
Cheshire
Visit site
(Posted by a friend on a differant site)
"Equally, I imagine that, sooner or later, there will be a court case involving a paintball gun. If the VCRB is made law then paintball guns will be outlawed overnight if a jury rules that Joe Public might mistake one for a firearm"





(reply from a lawyer who specialises in violent crime)
"There already has been at least one such case. I think it was a guilty plea, rather than a decision by a jury, but there are always going to be circumstances where a paintball gun could be mistaken for a firearm - sufficient to make it an "imitation firearm" under the Act.

What MOST paintball guns - er, sorry, MARKERS, ahem - are not is "realistic" imitation firearms as defined in the VCRB, because they look like plumbers' apprentice pieces. But if the UKPSF and others thinks that the Bill doesn't affect anything except the realistic-looking markers, they may have a wake-up call waiting for them in the shape of clauses 26 and particularly 27. Clause 26 makes it an offence to hire an air gun to someone under 18 - paintball guns use compressed air or CO2 to fire pellets, so could be classed as air guns - and clause 27 makes it an offence to fire one beyond the premises (so every paintball field will have to be completely enclosed in nets).

Possibly. The paintballers usually pin their hopes on the Home Office guidance which says that there's a difference between sporting equipment and weapons - which fails to deal with the fact that underwater spear guns have their own special clause (despite the fact that you might think they're "sporting equipment") and paintball guns hurt a LOT when you get hit (which kind of makes them a bit like a weapon in my neck of the woods).

I can't tell them what to do, but I would have thought that they'd be better off throwing their weight behind a campaign to limit the VCRB, than to sacrifice the small part of paintball that currently uses realistic markers"

Makes sense to me......
Anyone else?