Mainke wrote:
>>>I take it his opinion is the only valid one that is allowed on these boards. Now others will need to make their own opinions and since Petes only allowing his to be seen they can only see his abuse of power and position. So be it.
>>>I just saw another thread on here that I am worried will turn into a debate with only one side being shown and since I am actually not looking to start fights I have avoided posting in it.
and
>>>I am now going to avoid posting in any of the more controvertial threads. I no longer wish to participate in such threads here. I shall endeavour to help out where I can though.
Tough ****, if you feel this way, seriously. Is it such a good idea to hand debaters the moderating power, really? Isn't there a word like "exceptionable" (used in courts for a witness that are personally involved in an unapprorpiate manner for a witness, like)!? Get my drift here?
It's a pity if people get too scared to post here, right?
When something is deleted or changed it would be an idea to leave some marks from it... so you don't loose the thin red line when reading through the posts.
And to the topic about the filming. All specifieng rules makes the darn rule book too long. So; "Anything outside the net interfering with the game should be dealt with" period. So if someone gives signes, shouts or otherwise communicates from the sideline it should be dealt with - or anything else interfering. Filming from the sideline does obviously not interfer with the game - so that should of course be allowed (unless someone buys the exclusive filming rights or whatever).
Chill,
Kim1
