1--not in the least. I just couldn't be bothered to go dig out those original "ponts" so asked you to repeat them. After all, they were your points. Didn't realize you wouldn't remember them either.Originally posted by Hotpoint
1--Well your answer to 2 was immediately overruled by 4
2--The Phillipines a stretch... why? Admitedly the US never had much of an Empire, which limits the available examples, but its behavior was pretty bloody where it did. He who is without sin etc. etc.
3--It doesn't bother me why people learn the language of international trade it's just if it isn't going to be spelled properly, and they're going to use the wrong words for things, they shouldn't call it "English"
Well we don't actually, I work in SI units, don't in the slightest understand feet and inches unlike our American bretheren.Originally posted by Fab81
Yes, why Brits and American continue to use a measurement system completly archaic...
Im glad that we use the international measurement system in France, at least physics, mecanics are simpler...you don't have to do mad unit conversion. And this system is based on a rationnal scientific model, not on the size of my foot .
I quit, I won!Originally posted by Hotpoint
You're arguing linguistics. I'm arguing common usage, technically from a linguists point of view I'm speaking RP English (Received Pronunciation) but nobody really calls it that
Anyway given the reality that you and your countrymen don't call what you speak "American English" but rather just "English" I'm afraid your argument from scholarship is on dodgy ground
All Americans appear to think they know it all and I never give up on an argument because I almost invariably win in the end through sheer persistance, logic and bloody-mindedness
As for "Bull****ting" that's not my style
My apologies Baca. I misinterpreted your post and thought you were being hypocritical wheras you were just being too lazy to go back and look at an earlier pageOriginally posted by Baca Loco
1--I just couldn't be bothered to go dig out those original "ponts" so asked you to repeat them. After all, they were your points. Didn't realize you wouldn't remember them either.
I didn't so much refer to the US seizing the Islands during the Spanish-American War of 1896 but rather the US actions in the Islands afterwards. Very bloody indeed... check the historiesOriginally posted by Baca Loco
2--incursion into Phillipines due to it's then status as A SPANISH COLONY!
No you don't most of you call it EnglishOriginally posted by Baca Loco
3-- (We call American English out of respect but since you don't seem to like it . . . )
My apologiesOriginally posted by Baca Loco
Hotpoint and Wad--I leave for a little while and you trash a perfectly good brawl.
1--you do that alot.Originally posted by Hotpoint
1--I misinterpreted your post
2--I didn't so much refer to the US seizing the Islands during the Spanish-American War of 1896 but rather the US actions in the Islands afterwards. Very bloody indeed... check the histories
3--No you don't most of you call it English
4--My apologies
1 - I blame the authorOriginally posted by Baca Loco
1--you do that alot.
2--let me just say, Shaka Zulu
3--please re-read my statement. Place comma between American and English. If you insist on claiming the language the least you could do is manage to comprehend it.
4--apology accepted.