Won't happen. Not with the officials we have this year and the vast majority of the refs being our best pros from last year. We will make sure that there is total consistency field-to-field. Ulrich will see to it that is the case.Originally posted by go-one
But cos its all grey you'll have one thing happen on one field and another on another, or even on the same field dependent upon the nationality of the team / marshals.
i.e.
Player has gun in psp ramp mode, marshall does run away gun test, stops pulling gun stops firing, marshal then pulls trig ONCE 0.9 sec latter, gun fire 3 balls YOUR OUT OF HERE Player.
Next team, marshall knows team, don't throw in thr extra pull at the end, CARRY ON player !!!!
That will be you're loss because this will be a great and superbly officiated event. Too bad you're going to miss it.Originally posted by go-one
Remember the debackle of the dynobots shockers last year, multiply that by the number of teams present. I'm SSSOOO glad we're not doing bitberg !!
Hope so steve, but procedual consistancy does not solve the fact the rule is so porlly worded and open to interpritation in the 1st place. What is your take on it by the way ??Originally posted by Steve Morris
Won't happen. Not with the officials we have this year and the vast majority of the refs being our best pros from last year.
I hope it is, and its the one event I keep meaning to do due to living in germany for 5 years back in the 90's. However, like rabies and the love, we feel the maner in which the 'f' stamp problem and now this rule has been handled does not fill us with confidence we are going to pay our money and get value and a good time in return.Originally posted by Steve Morris
That will be you're loss because this will be a great and superbly officiated event. Too bad you're going to miss it.
I'm afraid I'm no longer in the loop about developing the rules and how they will be implemented. Since I'm just an ordinary foot soldier now I'll just accept what the board and the committees decide. Since I don't know so much yet about the hows and whys I had better not speculate. But I do stick by what I've said that I expect whatever is decided to be applied impartially and consistently. I know this isn't much meat on the bones but it's the best I can do now.Originally posted by go-one
Hope so steve, but procedual consistancy does not solve the fact the rule is so porlly worded and open to interpritation in the 1st place. What is your take on it by the way ??