No, as was said earlier there should a body of independent judges that have nothing to do but sniff out gun cheats.
As my final reply let me just say that allowing full auto would be a disaster. Allowing that only sends the clear mandate that cheaters aren't cheating, and lets them decide which rules to follow and which not to. It's completely pathetic that the EPA is seriously considering capitulating to the whims of the lunatic fringe. Is this going to happen every time an easy answer can't be found? What happens when the next big cheating issue pops up? I'm sure the ten minutes worth of brain work that went into that decision were tough but get real. There are enough clever sots out there to come up with a solution that doesn't involve letting the cheats and no game hosers decide the policies we all have to follow.
This was fun, see ya'll in hell.
As my final reply let me just say that allowing full auto would be a disaster. Allowing that only sends the clear mandate that cheaters aren't cheating, and lets them decide which rules to follow and which not to. It's completely pathetic that the EPA is seriously considering capitulating to the whims of the lunatic fringe. Is this going to happen every time an easy answer can't be found? What happens when the next big cheating issue pops up? I'm sure the ten minutes worth of brain work that went into that decision were tough but get real. There are enough clever sots out there to come up with a solution that doesn't involve letting the cheats and no game hosers decide the policies we all have to follow.
This was fun, see ya'll in hell.
