"First a sport needs to be recognised by the olympic commitee by meeting the olympic charter.."
Paintball meets most requirements there, it is officially played in 110 countries last i knew? Has a player base of around the 15 million mark world wide (certainly more than handball). So it comes back to the statement about rules. As much as I respect Robbo, and dont claim for a second to know paintball as well as he (*nod of respect to Robbo*
) I dont believe a unified rule set is a requirement. My logic behind this is the sports currently in the olympics. Many of which didnt use a unified rule set, they adapted one for the purpose based on the current rules of various major establishments in the specific sports. The unification of rules then came for these sports afterwards.
But the statement I do agree with more than anything, expecially after starting this:
"We are way too disjointed and disorganized for anybody to take us seriously."
That can certainly be identified as a major problem for paintball; I do truely believe paintball in the olympics isn't too much of a stretch of the imagination, but as Robbo said its the disorganisation that really causes the issue. I dont think we'd need a World Paintball Association before being accepted into the olympics, but we'd deffinately need more stability and commitment within the industy and community.
I think what may be in our favour more than anything (or unfortunatly could be our ultimate failing
) is the fact that paintball, although standing for everything the olympics intends, it would be, by far, the most "gear intensive" sport in it. That may mean that the IOC would be more open to considering it in a different manor; simply for the sake of having the oppotunity to appeal to a wider audience and increase the variety of the olympics.
(Sign it anyway, it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling inside
)