Agreed, but that obviously means that either the price has to come down to meet the current value of an event, or the events have to become better.Jonathan, it seems like you are saying 'We need to make it cheaper for the players to play'
Is that what your basic context is?
If so, then I think you are dead wrong. It's not about price. It's about value.
I was about to comment something similar.OK, let's talk about common sense.
What single thing would result in a huge saving to teams?
Not releasing field layouts before an event.
This would remove the pressure on teams to play the layout prior to the event, and give a huge saving on paint. This would cost the event organisers nothing.
It would also reintroduce the old school skill of wlaking the field on the day of the event.
If Pete could get the MS to agree to this, and other leagues followed suit, it would be a significant saving for teams, allowing them to play more events.
For me, a large part of the value is the cameraderie, which evolves into freindships, experiences shared etc. It used to be that the players party was a big deal, and a real value-adder, however this is no longer the case as the demographic is now too young to participate, hence the value is not there for them. Also, the 'getaway' aspect, where grown men go out and share the paintball experience with their mates, leaving the wife & kids at home and doing something for themselves - A teenage demographic does not realise this value either.Agreed, but that obviously means that either the price has to come down to meet the current value of an event, or the events have to become better.
Right now, prices are high, value is low.
So basically, for the current demographic the value isn't there.For me, a large part of the value is the cameraderie, which evolves into freindships, experiences shared etc. It used to be that the players party was a big deal, and a real value-adder, however this is no longer the case as the demographic is now too young to participate, hence the value is not there for them. Also, the 'getaway' aspect, where grown men go out and share the paintball experience with their mates, leaving the wife & kids at home and doing something for themselves - A teenage demographic does not realise this value either.
My point is, the value is still there, in many ways, but the current paintball players can't access it and so thereofre do not appreciate it. We need an older demographic.
My idea to create this is actually to separate age-groups and start a Junior (U18) league that runs alongside the current one. I believe this would work if adopted.