I don't think so, as you fit 400 ball bearing in just a one meter row, and that means that to put the first layer in the box is 160,000. Then the next layer doesn't sit directly on top for the first layer it sits in the gaps between the lower ball bearings. Which means that you can fit 399 in a row, therefore can fit 159,201.Oops, can't read.
Nealy 117 million? Thats a tad high And I doubt 9 million meters of surface area aswell mate.
Well, I have just realised my numbers are totally wrong, again. Even though I did work out 160,000 on the bottom row before hand... It's all written downI don't think so, as you fit 400 ball bearing in just a one meter row, and that means that to put the first layer in the box is 160,000. Then the next layer doesn't sit directly on top for the first layer it sits in the gaps between the lower ball bearings. Which means that you can fit 399 in a row, therefore can fit 159,201.
Now this is where I guessed a little, that the combined hight of the two layers were 1.5 diameter. which means that you can fit 266 dual layers into the box, plus another 160,000 layer with the remaining space.
But yes I did make a mistake with the total surface area, as I used the diameter and not the radius. The total surface area when using the radius is 2,293,911 meters.
Btw I know it sounds odd, however I am using crystal structures and solid state physics.
Almost, however using the hexagonal close packing structure means that it is possible to fit 399 in the row of the second layer. Due the second layer ball bearing sitting in the gaps the bottoms are lower so the over all hight is less. This is where I guessed that the hight of the two layer is 3.5mm but that was just a guess.Well, I have just realised my numbers are totally wrong, again. Even though I did work out 160,000 on the bottom row before hand... It's all written down
Surely in the gaps you can only fit 398 in a row?
So the layers would be; 400 x 400 > 398 x 398 > 400 x 400 > 398 x 398 etc, all the way to the top.
If four ball bearings were put into a cube, then one ball bearing would fit into the middle of them, so a 400 x 400 > 398 x 398 > 400 x 400 would only be 5mm tall right? And thats 478404 in the first 5mm in hight?
Ahh I see what you mean,Almost, however using the hexagonal close packing structure means that it is possible to fit 399 in the row of the second layer. Due the second layer ball bearing sitting in the gaps the bottoms are lower so the over all hight is less. This is where I guessed that the hight of the two layer is 3.5mm but that was just a guess.
Yes your right with the hight. I did use the hight with my working, i think.Ahh I see what you mean,
Although, I wasn't really taking that into account, and 'assumed' that the combined height of layer one and two would be 2.5mm + 1.25mm, therefore 3.75mm, not 3.5. Therefore, when the third layer was stacked onto the top, it would add an extra 1.25mm making the overall height of that pattern 5mm.
Judging by my total fail in previous calculations I think you are right.Yes your right with the hight. I did use the hight with my working, i think.
Well I hope I was on the right lines, as from the two science questions that I saw. This was the one that I could do in a sleepy state.
I just want to know if I was right or not now.