Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

why are most brits gay?

Micah

New Member
to my knowlage Not one of the nations in the pacific Donated one man or machine (ship, plane, what ever) to the War effort. And, I can not find a single thing online that is contraty to my knowlage.

Further more, The teriable movie peral harbor Does not deal with teh end of the war rather one stragic bombing run launched shorty after Dec. 17, 1941. Setup to hit the Japaniese where they lived. it was called the Dolittle Raid. The war itself was not delt with at all in the movie.

if you can find information contrary to this I am willing to read about it. But this is what they teach us in school, this is what's on the history channel, and this is what's on the internet.

-Micah
 

Manning26

Well-Known Member
Micah, tsk tsk, you should know how freakin' terrible U.S. history books are. If we went back and read all of 'em, including college, according to them we did everything. Check out the book, "Lies My Teacher Told Me," if you want some serious corrections. I can think of one plane, the Brewster Buffalo, that plenty of Allied pilots died in while fighting the Japanese Imperial Navy, and that is a Brit plane. Although I'm sure more Wildcats, Airacobras, and P-40 variations were tumbling out of the sky before the Japanese Zeros than Buffalos, there were other nations and their equipment fighting right beside us. Buddha knows his stuff, he and Mordhir are right about the U.S. doing the island hopping, but there were many nations fighting the Japanese all over Asia.

Buddha, it seems like we re-do this thread about every three months. To all my American brothers, burn your school history books, and go buy books written by people who were there, or atleast written by historians who give facts that don't need to be twisted to be published. America's need to lie to itself is sad, and our history is so distorted that our youth don't even know their own past. Alright, getting off the soapbox, this really isn't the place for this rant. Good day, all. Thanks for bein' there Buddha.:)
 

Micah

New Member
Ok, i know american history books are crap, that's a given.

and maybe some British designed aircraft were shot down over the Pacific. But who built them? Well, most likely the US simply becasue the US had the Human Rescources as well as the materials. Who felw the planes over the Pacific? well, again most likely the US due to the fact the us had the means to train pilots.

I know the Brits are great designers (to bring this back to paintball) look at the Angel. Very slick piece of kit. But of course the Autococker (well, WGP 'guns) has been the work horse of tournament paintball longer than most of us even knew paintball existed ...

I don't know where I'm going with this so I'll quit before I fall too far behind ...

-Micah
 

Mador

lurkin' in a dark place
Aug 7, 2001
178
0
0
Selby ...near York.
Visit site
OK lets set the record straight...WW2 was not won by the yanks alone...sad for their ego's but it's true..

America only entered WW2 after being attacked at Pearl harbour..a political decision..no more..before this attack they were selling pre WW1 destroyers to us at exhorbitant rates...a debt I may add that we are still paying..says it all really.

At that point in time the Brits were engaging the Germans in North Africa...with little military support from home..,mostly convoys of supplies were destroyed by U-boats....Engalnd was under seige...it was only after certain naval battles were won that Britain had control of the north atlantic...and even to the end of the war..the run to re-inforce the russians continued under constant German attack..

If you are willing to review your history ppl....then you may realise that England held it's own..despite it's disasters in norway and in other places.

D-Day proved this........after all where were the heaviest casualties found?....

Omaha beach...subjuct of a film or two methinks......no mention of the other beaches....e.g Sword.....taken with few casuailties by commando's...suprisingly mostly British ....Hmm....pausing in thought now....is the british soldier better trained?.....perhaps....but we will never know....but think on this...we have the most highly trained special forces unit in the world......even the Mossad come to us for lessons in counter-terrorism..the USA (god Bless 'em) have forgiven us burning thier capital city..

So ppl are we readdy to realise no country is better than the other??........we each have our own ideals and ideoligy....but we are all working to a common goal...........PEACE..

Life is too short to have a continual grudge with someone....

Peace to y'all

Mador

BTW I have an Uncle dropped in Arnheim.....read the history and then tell me what horror is.......his tales scare the sh*te out of me..
 

Micah

New Member
I don't think any one here ever said that the US won the War in europe "single handedly" we were how ever the turning point of the war.

Now about D-Day, Convienient that the british would attack sword, as it was the least defended beach of the lot. osisting of mostly a residential area rather than tons of pill boxes, traps, and artllery zero'd in on the beach.

You know the US was expecting almost 5 times the casualties seen at omaha beach. Are the Regular infantry of the United states better trained? ... perhaps ... but we will never know ... but think on this ... we have the most money in the world and we're willing to throw it at a problem until it goes away.

-Micah
 

Radium

New Member
Jan 2, 2002
41
0
0
Yank
Visit site
Robbo you are really a stand up guy and i'm glad that i made that offer after the first of the year. You would kill me but i figured to be fair for my bashing the brits i'd let them have their fair shot at retaliation since i started it. I look foward to meeting you at one of these NPPL events. As far as the rest I have passed history 101 and 102 about ww2 in the eyes of England Guys and hey we are all on the same team .
 

TheRo0sTer

VW's are the game
In all of your history lessons taught here, you all failed to mention that there we 1000's of US Air Force personnal stationed in England North and South! At the time they were known as the Army Air Corps. So there were Americans fighting side by side in England with British military just not on the ground, but in the Sky. A majority of the Pilots and ground crew were A.A.C. volunteers back in the US. That's just my 2 cents! No who is better! Or who WON anything. Just the Facts only the Facts!
 

Buddha 3

Hamfist McPunchalot
Originally posted by Micah
I don't think any one here ever said that the US won the War in europe "single handedly" we were how ever the turning point of the war.

Now about D-Day, Convienient that the british would attack sword, as it was the least defended beach of the lot. osisting of mostly a residential area rather than tons of pill boxes, traps, and artllery zero'd in on the beach.

You know the US was expecting almost 5 times the casualties seen at omaha beach. Are the Regular infantry of the United states better trained? ... perhaps ... but we will never know ... but think on this ... we have the most money in the world and we're willing to throw it at a problem until it goes away.

-Micah
Sorry to burst your bubble, but the least defended beach was Utah (one of the two American beaches).
The beach at which most casualties fell was Omaha. This was because of some serious foul ups. Both the naval and air bombardments had been largely off target. This was because the clouds at Omaha were overcast, obscuring sight for the strategic bombers. Because of the fear of droppin their bombs short of target (and thereby dumping them in between the approaching invasion fleet), the pilots dropped there bombs a few seconds late, causing them to hit the earth a few miles inland, thereby missing the beach defenses. The naval bombardment was mostly without effect because of the smoke caused by the opening barrage. Shots were fired blindly. The situation was critical at Omaha, until a few destroyers moved dangerously close to the surf, and started blasting German pillboxes at point blank range. Also, the presence of a few junior officers and NCO's who'd decided they had taken enough of a shelacking made a huge impact. The problem was that a large part of the leadership of the first wave had died on the beach, rendering the landing parties leaderless, until these previously mentioned people decided it was better to die trying than just to die.
Don't think the English had a cakewalk. The Canadians had the toughest job of the British beaches, landing in front of heavy defensive positions. The situation was not unlike Omaha beach, but the Canadians were able to move inland a lot quicker, because of the absence of a 100ft bluff, a feature that seriously hindered operations at Omaha.
The British may not have suffered as bad as the US on D-Day, but in the following days they actually took on a larger proportion of the German army. In Normandy the British faced most of the German Panzer divisions, including a number of SS formations.
One battle the Americans did fight almost singlehandedly was the battle of the Bulge, the Ardennes offensive. This was however by default, since the Germans decided to launch an attack against a US part of the front.

I hate bring it to you, but the Russians were winning the war in 1943 already, way before any Brits or Yanks set foot on continental Europe. After the debacle at Stalingrad, the German army ceased to be a real offensive threat after the battle of Kursk, where most of the German armoured formations were decimated to the point of no recovery.

If you want to know more about this sort of stuff, I suggest you read D-Day, by Steven Ambrose. It'll tell you all you want to know about that day, since it's composed of archival research, combined with eyewitness accounts of the people who were there, including the Germans.

Enough of this now! It's time we realise that no country is better than the other! Yes, country X may be more developed than country Y, but that does not make a person from country X more valuable or intelligent than the person from country Y. There are scholars in underdeveloped countries too. Do not for one minute think that you are better or smarter than somebody from the deep dark jungles of God knows where. Yes, this person may not be as adapt at the important things in life, like posting on this board. But I bet that this guy stands a better chance of surviving in the Jungle than any of us. So how good you are, is only determined by the extent to which you are adapted to your surroundings.
Don't forget, there are dumb asses in every society!!!

I have to say that it's funny to see how the countries that fought in WWII all tell history in a slightly different way, just to make themselves look better. Sometimes it's good to be from a country that hardly made a contribution, it allows one to look at things unbiased.


Peace ya'll!
 

Buddha 3

Hamfist McPunchalot
Originally posted by TheRo0sTer
In all of your history lessons taught here, you all failed to mention that there we 1000's of US Air Force personnal stationed in England North and South! At the time they were known as the Army Air Corps. So there were Americans fighting side by side in England with British military just not on the ground, but in the Sky. A majority of the Pilots and ground crew were A.A.C. volunteers back in the US. That's just my 2 cents! No who is better! Or who WON anything. Just the Facts only the Facts!
Whoops! You must have posted this while I was typing my previous post......:D
What you say is basically true (expect an airforce guy to come up with this :D ), but don't forget that the Army Air Corps had it's own airfields and British Bomber Command and Fighter Command had it's own too. Plus the US believed in daylight bombing, while the British went for nighttime raids. There was relatively little mixing of the troops. There was a lot of mixing with the local population though (nudge nudge, wink wink), and the Yanks were very popular around there billeted areas, because a lot of girls thought they had smarter uniforms. Also they were paid better than there British equivalents. A common saying amongst British troops was that the problem with the Americans was that they were 'overpayed, oversexed, and over her'.
Keeping the troops seperated is actually a smart thing to do, since it negates a lot of burocratical BS. The troops were somewhat intermixed during Desert Strom, and the ridiculously complex chain of command that resulted from this, was partially to blame for the destroying of the British Warrior APC's by the US airforce, because it took too long for the information about the location of the British armour to reach the American pilots. What works in normal life, seems to work in the military too. Keep it simple, stupid! :D


Can we get back to 'balling now?