Chris, you wrote:
"Now, if it's ruled by the refs that player B was NOT playing on, then the hits on Player B are valid, and he gets the playing on penalty, even if player A thinks the hits are not valid."
Did you mean to type:
"Now, if it's ruled by the refs that player B was NOT playing on, then the hits on Player A are valid, and he gets the playing on penalty, even if player A thinks the hits are not valid."
If you typed exactly what you meant to type, then my simple monkey brain is still confused, and I need further elucidation, or at least a shiny object or food to distract me.
If my proofreading of your above quote is correct, then i am a happy monkey, and I will take a nap now.
"Now, if it's ruled by the refs that player B was NOT playing on, then the hits on Player B are valid, and he gets the playing on penalty, even if player A thinks the hits are not valid."
Did you mean to type:
"Now, if it's ruled by the refs that player B was NOT playing on, then the hits on Player A are valid, and he gets the playing on penalty, even if player A thinks the hits are not valid."
If you typed exactly what you meant to type, then my simple monkey brain is still confused, and I need further elucidation, or at least a shiny object or food to distract me.
If my proofreading of your above quote is correct, then i am a happy monkey, and I will take a nap now.