Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

Wait for it

O

ollytheosteo

Guest
Not to be a smartarse;) but a marker isn't classed in UK law as a firearm, air weapon or indeed any sort of weapon. Long may that be so.
 

le-pig

the brotherhood
May 16, 2002
2,899
0
61
isle of man
Visit site
Originally posted by ollytheosteo
Not to be a smartarse;) but a marker isn't classed in UK law as a firearm, air weapon or indeed any sort of weapon. Long may that be so.
ermm yes it is smart ass,paint guns follow uk air arm laws:rolleyes:
 

Skeet

Platinum Member
Originally posted by ollytheosteo
Not to be a smartarse;) but a marker isn't classed in UK law as a firearm, air weapon or indeed any sort of weapon. Long may that be so.
Then don't be a smart ass, when plainly you are not.

Markers, are AIR WEAPONS..and as such are classified as "non lethal firearms", provided they do not produce more than 12ft/lb's of muzzle energy for a rifle, and 6ft/lbs of muzzle energy for a pistol.

More over...anything that a person thinks, is a firearm, in a situation where they believe to be at risk from said firearm...automaticly becomes classified as firearm and will be treated as such, by the attending police officers, and in any court proceedings.

Do not get involved in a discussion about firearms law with me and try and tell me I am wrong.
Seldom will I publicly give an opinion, or information, unless I am sure I know what I am talking about....and when it comes to Firearms...I'm pretty hot...having several myself.

Are you aware, that, not too long ago...you would have needed a Firearm certificate, in order to keep a Co2 powered "Airgun" or Marker?
 

JoseDominguez

New cut and carved spine!
Oct 25, 2002
3,185
0
0
www.myspace.com
Sorry peeps, but under UK law, markers are currently completely ignored or considered toys......... not under firearms law at all...... otherwise ramping would be completely illegal :) as the law hasn't been changed.
There ya go. Read up on the recent case of "drive by" and how the courts viewed the use of a marker in "what would otherwise have been considered a serious assault". Still a "grey area" but markers are pretty much in the same boat as airsoft......... the only way you'd get done is because they look a bit like guns, using one to intimidate could land a firearms charge, but ONLY if it was used to intimidate and looked like a gun (you can face this charge using a carrot in a carrier bag).
So, Ollie is being a Smart arse, he's just a bit more informed on current info.

So, regardless of "opinion".... look up the recent paintball drivebye case, at no point was it considered a "firearms" offence. We've just spent a lot of time "under the impression" that markers were covered by the act. (Myself included, just believed the hype).
 

Skeet

Platinum Member
Originally posted by JoseDominguez
Sorry peeps, but under UK law, markers are currently completely ignored or considered toys......... not under firearms law at all...... otherwise ramping would be completely illegal :) as the law hasn't been changed.
There ya go. Read up on the recent case of "drive by" and how the courts viewed the use of a marker in "what would otherwise have been considered a serious assault". Still a "grey area" but markers are pretty much in the same boat as airsoft......... the only way you'd get done is because they look a bit like guns, using one to intimidate could land a firearms charge, but ONLY if it was used to intimidate and looked like a gun (you can face this charge using a carrot in a carrier bag).
So, Ollie is being a Smart arse, he's just a bit more informed on current info.

So, regardless of "opinion".... look up the recent paintball drivebye case, at no point was it considered a "firearms" offence. We've just spent a lot of time "under the impression" that markers were covered by the act. (Myself included, just believed the hype).
Airsoft, are considered toys, because they produce less than 1 Joule of energy and are not considered to be lethal.
An airweapon, for example, can kill a rabbit..or similar, and has killed people in the past, one just the other day.
People have mentioned in the past, the effect an electro marker, loaded with marbles could have....not lethal?
Markers are, by definition..an Airgun.
They use a self contained compressed gas source to fire a projectile....fact.
The law is open to interpretation, when presented in court.
The Judge, in this drive by case, (of which I am not fully aware), could just as easily, have thrown the book, at the indiviuals involved, but most likely chose, to term it as devilment, rather than to have these silly buggers, banged up, for Firearms offences.
Markers have not been ignored, more have developed, around the law...as I said, Co2 required a Section 1 FAC, when used with any air powered weapon, including markers.
Markers produce, near on 12ft/lbs of muzzle energy, at 300fps.
Technicly speaking, nobody under the age of 17 should be able to buy a Marker, as that is what the law states in reference to an air weapon of any kind.

The term Grey area..is very appropriate, as markers are in this grey area.
if an Airgun, produces more than 12ft/lbs, it is considered a Section 1 firearm...Fully automatic weapons, are Section 5, illegal, to private citizens...ramping, is a grey area..as, it isnt fully automatic, as described in law, but...it does produce more than one shot, per pull of the trigger...like wise, it isnt burst fire either, as such.
Ramping is not something, that could be easily classifide, as it has no bearing on firearms, as they were, when the law was passed...there is no reason, why any rifle, pistol or machine gun, should require the ability, to ramp shots, in the way that we do....ours ramp, as a means of making it easier to fire our guns, at a rate we require, to play a game...WITHOUT it being FULL AUTO...if, there was no legal bearing on Markers...then why are we not using full auto, capped at 15 BPS for safety?
Coz its illegal to have a fully automatic weapon...thats why.

Paintball Attacker Jailed For 12 Months
A participant in a paintball drive by in the United Kingdom has been sentenced to jail for 12 months. Dion Hunter, 23, was a passenger in a sports car when he fired several rounds at pedestrians and a bus.

pbnews.jpg
The attacker, Dion Hunter, was charged with "three counts of possessing an imitation firearm with intent to cause fear of violence." Hunter plead guilty on all three accounts.


http://www.paintballstar.com/pn/modules.php?op=modload&name=PagEd&file=index&topic_id=21&page_id=200

That one I assume?
As I suspected, the it was described as "witless tomfoolery"...they were lucky.

You can bet your bollox...if someone ever did, carry out a crime, using a marker like a shocker, and a marble loaded Halo...he wouldnt get told off, for his "witless tomfoolery"...and before anyone says, that "Dion" didnt commit a crime....shooting somone with something, who doesnt want to be shot, is assault, and hence...criminal.

Has anyone ever imported a marker, and been asked to provide a declaration, as to it's legality in the UK? Yep.

On a lighter note...
Meirion Davies, defending Hunter, said: "Nobody was going to be injured as a result of this witless piece of tomfoolery."

What is he...'kin Psychic? Twat...

:rolleyes:
 
O

ollytheosteo

Guest
Ok. I'm not doing online arguments for a while :rolleyes: but I was under the impression that under UK law "firearm" is a specific term that refers to a "lethal, barreled weapon" and airguns fall in to this catagory as they fire lead pellets that can be dangerous/lethal. I am well aware of the CO2/firearms situation- I went straight out and bought a CO2 target pistol when they came off ticket and have held a UK shotgun certificate for the last 12 years or so. (It's worth noting that back in the day we all ran around shooting CO2 markers at each other whilst CO2 pellet guns were still Section 1 firearms, with no notice taken by the law or anyone else.) Markers fail on two counts- they are not weapons, as they are not designed to kill animals or people, and are not lethal as they fire frangible ammo as designed. Putting marbles in a marker makes no difference as they are not designed to fire such things, and let's hope to all that's holy that no-one ever does, because the sport in the UK will be in danger if they do. This is why a few folks have problems with reballs as they could potentially take markers into a different catagory. UK paintball has voluntarily followed the airgun laws up to now and has been left alone after demonstrating a willingness to police itself, but ask Steve Bull, Bonich, Russell Rule book etc and they will confirm this. Sooner or later the legal status will be confirmed in court and then we may have to reconcile to some changes, but as far am I as aware markers are not firearms by law at present and thus are not covered. Threatening someone with an imitation firearm is a crime that can be applied to waving the wrong kind of water pistol at someone and doesn't really apply in this case. That's how I thought it went, if I'm wrong then fair enough,no harm no foul, sorry to stick my oar in. :eek:
 
O

ollytheosteo

Guest
TL- it's a date:p

Just remember that cane of mine doesn't count as a weapon either;)