Mr Bling, you are suggesting something I have never come across before in my 24 years in paintball .. you are talking about a systematic campaign over 3 years to 'dick you' as you put it.
As for free speech?
I got no problem whatsoever in you exercising your right to vent at anything on here and so please feel free to go the whole hog and tell all; if people have done this, then I don't give a **** if you name and shame but before you do, hear me out.
If this guy really had a campaign of hate and rule abuse to get at you guys then don't you think someone would have said anything in that 3 years?
you can't just keep that sorta sh!t to yourself .. you know what paintball is like .. word gets out about everything .... are you seriously suggesting he maintained this campaign punctuated with various examples of dicking you over the past 3 years and yet he kept if from all the other judges??
And if one of them found out or indeed he told someone else, then that would have gotten out and into the paintball domain within days ... and it hasn't.
Why not?
Maybe because what you actually witnessed were isolated instances of a guy who doesn't like you [for whatever reason; it would be nice to underscore this all with a possible motive here] making mistakes either deliberately or accidentally and him not really caring what you think afterwards ... I would think it nigh on impossible for him to maintain a systematic campaign for 3 years without someone spouting off ..
Nobody likes to lose, nobody likes to lose because of someone's mistake but the real kicker is when you lose because of someone's deliberate bias ... but what you accuse is something else again mate.
I just can't get my head around this accusation, it just doesn't fly with me unless you come out with a lot more evidence.
I think it would also be cool if the judge in question came on here and answered your attacks ... I shall make a call to Rich and see if we can arrange something.