I got this...
While it is fun to go on all these "what if" trips, that's all they are.
I could tell you so much about what is wrong with the way paintball is organised. Just take a few minutes to think about the differences between the way paintball is run (pretty much worldwide) and the way for instance soccer is organised from lowly "pub-clubs", to the Premier League. Just grab a pen and have some fun with that. Strangely, you'll find that some of the ideas put forward by the PA league weren't that crazy.
Anyway, back to the issue at hand. If it were as easy as just getting three people to sit down and have chat, don't you think it would have happened already? And even if you were to get them to sit down and give this some proper thought, what will the result be?
Obviously, each of these people will think that what they are doing is the right thing, so why would they change what they are doing? Naturally it should be the others that would need to change.
If you can get past that first obstacle, the result will be some form of compromise. By it's very nature, compromise is usually just something akin to a toothless tiger; it may growl, but its gums won't do much harm.
In order to avoid the compromise scenario, there would have to be some powerful force that could pretty much dictate format and whatnot. Given the amount of economical and political power required, I'd say that this power would have to be industry driven. So instead of looking at these three people, perhaps you should look elsewhere.
Now while you guys are all thinking big, as in nationwide, one of the issues addressed in this thread is that of distance. Now while serious players should be willing to travel the length and breadth of the country, I can understand why the for sh!ts and giggles players don't feel like doing so.
It is perfectly alright for the serious leagues to ignore these individuals, perhaps as paintball as a whole, we should not. After all, there can be strong "trickle up" effect if we make the transition from rec to tourney that much easier (as pointed out in some great threads earlier). Some of the not so serious guys may well get hooked and may well be willing to switch to more serious teams. So maybe, instead of making EVERYTHING nationwide, there is room for smaller, regional leagues/events. But wait, that would be too much like other sports, surely that can't be correct...
So yes, it makes sense to have one nationwide league for the top teams and serious teams in the slightly lower divisions. But you will need some heavy industry hitters to set that up.
But at a ground level, this nationwide league will achieve very little, you'd also need regional, low level stuff for the people just getting into the sport.