R
raehl
Guest
Bah...
You'll never have complete "fairness" as long as some teams are better than others, interdivisional play or not.
That's why you have prelims, semifinals and finals - after you look at prelim scores, you have a better idea who the "good" teams that day are. You stick 2-4x as many of the teams as you plan on advancing to finals into semis, just to make sure you get everyone DESPITE any inequities in the seeding, and since you're seeding semis based on prelim scores, semis are much better seeded that prelims were and thus give you a much better result when you move into finals.
A seeding system that is mostly fair most of the time (in the sense that everyone plays the same difficulty of teams) is the best you can hope for, but a system that is completely fair all of the time (in the sense that it's done EXACTLY the same way every time so any inequities are just the result of hands-off application of the rules and not someone's "feeling" on what is and isn't fair) is absolutely necessary.
Dynasty can only play so many games, so some people are going to be happy they don't have them and some will be unhappy they do. If you then try and give more moderately difficult teams to the teams that don't have Dynasty (or just another team you feel is as good as Dynasty), well, some people will agree with your assessment of team skill, and some won't. Can't win.
So just do it the same every time.
- Chris
You'll never have complete "fairness" as long as some teams are better than others, interdivisional play or not.
That's why you have prelims, semifinals and finals - after you look at prelim scores, you have a better idea who the "good" teams that day are. You stick 2-4x as many of the teams as you plan on advancing to finals into semis, just to make sure you get everyone DESPITE any inequities in the seeding, and since you're seeding semis based on prelim scores, semis are much better seeded that prelims were and thus give you a much better result when you move into finals.
A seeding system that is mostly fair most of the time (in the sense that everyone plays the same difficulty of teams) is the best you can hope for, but a system that is completely fair all of the time (in the sense that it's done EXACTLY the same way every time so any inequities are just the result of hands-off application of the rules and not someone's "feeling" on what is and isn't fair) is absolutely necessary.
Dynasty can only play so many games, so some people are going to be happy they don't have them and some will be unhappy they do. If you then try and give more moderately difficult teams to the teams that don't have Dynasty (or just another team you feel is as good as Dynasty), well, some people will agree with your assessment of team skill, and some won't. Can't win.
So just do it the same every time.
- Chris