- Someone in charge - Academic really but essentially no, sorry mate
- Each member knows and can do their job Hmmmmm, well sorta but I suppose that's a given really.
- Each member knows why their job is important Well, that just sounds like fancy wrapping to me mate.
- Each member knows each others job and it's importance Once again, sounds as tho it does make sense but in reality, it just don't add up to much at all ......
- Each member knows the plan or plans You are assuming here that all team work is gonna be restricted to game plans and that's just not the case mate. Teamwork is exampled in all phases of a game with it's appearance in game plans being the minor part.
At the risk of continuing to appear retarded;
Someone in charge
Well...in my experience (not just paintball, as my experience there is limited), any team that produces results by working together, has to have someone who is in charge. A democracy might work some of the time, but ultimately, they need to have a decision maker. Academic, yes, but a factor nonetheless.
Knows and can do their job
Again, a given perhaps, but if it wasn't there, would the team work?
One would assume shooting the opposition, is a good start, but each player has a main role, so they need to know what it it is.
Knows why their job is important
Fancy wrapping. OK, yeah..."your an important part of the team" to make them feel less like cannon fodder. Not what I mean. It is one thing to tell someone what to do, another to tell them why they are doing it, which leads on to...
Knows each others job and it's importance
Because then, they can pre empt what a team mate will do next, based on what they are doing and what they are achieving. Also, they can prioritize their role and that of another player, should that player be lost. So they can decide if they need to insert, cross up or do two roles etc.
Knows the plan or plans
I have never really been a believer in planning too far...not much further than the break really...but a team usually has a plan of sorts, and a backup plan. Especially if they know how the opposition is likely to play. So by knowing what way to play the field, rather than hope for the best, reactions should be more instincive.
I am more convinced of my first post than this one, but I was trying to breeak down what any team of people,
should know in order to complete a task, which is another way to look at how "Teamwork", can deliver results. It is not an additional to my first post, but an alternative, simplified possibility.
As I aluded to im my initial post. My belief, is that watching a team "working together", could be based on drummed in drills and scenarios along with the technical ability, or intuitive behaviour produced amongst a tight group combined with technical ability. With my bet going to the team that knows each other, rather than the robots.