Yes, this has been discussed somewhat in a number of recent threads but all those threads have lots of other things going on as well and I thought it might be useful to single out some issues so it's clear to everyone without wading through dozens of unrelated posts.
Aparently the Mil Series, in attempting to control staining paint, has decided to further regulate the player. Already the players must only use Series or event sponsors paint and now the idea is to restrict that to must purchase on site sponsors paint.
But just how does this help reduce the use of staining paint? Isn't it the manufacturers who are responsible for whats in their paint? Does the Mil Series expect the paint producers to make unique product for their events alone? Or do they expect the paint produced generally to conform to requirements of the Series? Either way what have the players got to do with it?
The NPPL has extensive rules on staining paint which are routinely ignored by everyone if Miami is any indication. What's the NPPL gonna do--get tough with big sponsors and risk losing the green? Doesn't same situation apply to Millennium?
Seems to me the only thing placing further demands on the players does is assure additional site sales to the paint sponsors who are paying big for the privilege to be there.
Aparently the Mil Series, in attempting to control staining paint, has decided to further regulate the player. Already the players must only use Series or event sponsors paint and now the idea is to restrict that to must purchase on site sponsors paint.
But just how does this help reduce the use of staining paint? Isn't it the manufacturers who are responsible for whats in their paint? Does the Mil Series expect the paint producers to make unique product for their events alone? Or do they expect the paint produced generally to conform to requirements of the Series? Either way what have the players got to do with it?
The NPPL has extensive rules on staining paint which are routinely ignored by everyone if Miami is any indication. What's the NPPL gonna do--get tough with big sponsors and risk losing the green? Doesn't same situation apply to Millennium?
Seems to me the only thing placing further demands on the players does is assure additional site sales to the paint sponsors who are paying big for the privilege to be there.