Welcome To P8ntballer.com
The Home Of European Paintball
Sign Up & Join In

SmartParts can't ship guns?

dnafwtbtitft

The bell tolls...
Jul 23, 2003
53
0
0
In my own little world.
Visit site
Originally posted by Sean@smartpartswest
AS OF DECEMBER 10TH, 2004,

SMART PARTS COMPLIED WITH THE INJUNCTION BY MAKING THE NECESSARY CHANGES TO NERVE, SHOCKER AND IMPULSE MARKERS.

SMART PARTS IS CONTINUING TO SHIP ITS NERVE, SHOCKER AND IMPULSE MARKERS. NO MARKERS SOLD SINCE DECEMBER 10TH INFRINGE.

DEALERS NEED NOT WORRYABOUT PAST OR FUTURE SALES OF ANY SMART PARTS MARKERS.

THE DAMAGES COVER ALL INDIVIDUALS AND DEALERS WHO PURCHASED NERVES, SHOCKERS AND IMPULSES PRIOR TO DECEMBER 10, 2004.
So... what happens now? What changes did they make? Who's to say it no longer infringes?
 

irons69

BEACH BUM
Jun 11, 2002
1,788
62
83
kent
would it be right for WDP to tighten the screws against SMART PARTS i think not
would WDP done the same thing if thay had all the so called patents???
no one forsure knows what is going on only the top peaple at WDP and SMART PARTS do
i think we are all jumping the gun at the moment let,s just wait and see
i for one can not get on with a angel but thats me
i perfur my SHOCKER and E2
at the end of the day WDP are not going to want to get a bad name like SMART PARTS did a while ago
both partys will come to a deal that suits them both
 

manike

INCEPTIONDESIGNS.COM
Jul 9, 2001
3,064
10
63
Cloud 9
www.inceptiondesigns.com
From a thread on PBN with an SP rep...

Originally posted by Sean@smartpartswest
The only thing that was changed was that you cannot re-program the board. Everything else is the same. you guys will never know the difference. Now some of you will go.."you can reprogram the board?" I know nothing....
 

Matski

SO hot right now
Aug 8, 2001
1,737
0
0
You love what?

Irons69, get the hell outa here....and tell webbie to smile its f*cking xmas!:D :p
 

Steve Hancock

Free man!
Aug 7, 2003
1,489
0
0
43
Birmingham (UK)
students.bugs.bham.ac.uk
Hmm,

The injunction was on the markers as they stood, they were ruled to be in breach of the patents. Would a minor alteration to the marker, although not alter the fact that they are in breech of the patent, still require afresh injunctio to enforce it?

I wonder...
 

Doc.Hensel

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
17
0
0
Visit site
Originally posted by manike
From a thread on PBN with an SP rep...


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Sean@smartpartswest
The only thing that was changed was that you cannot re-program the board. Everything else is the same. you guys will never know the difference. Now some of you will go.."you can reprogram the board?" I know nothing....
So in a worst case scenario
the SP markers :eek: could become the only legal tournament markers since they are NOT reprogrammable anymore ??
 

Flash-Bugout

doin' other stuffs
Jul 6, 2001
1,282
0
61
need to get hold of Tank for an exit
Originally posted by manike
From a thread on PBN with an SP rep...

Originally posted by Sean@smartpartswest
The only thing that was changed was that you cannot re-program the board. Everything else is the same. you guys will never know the difference. Now some of you will go.."you can reprogram the board?" I know nothing....
So the boards are no longer re-programmable.

So that means no changing of modes, RoF, and dwell settings? To me that is reprogramming. But what would I know? :confused:

[edit - add] Actually, thinking about it, it probably just means that the chip is of the type that wll not accept any changes to the programming at all - things like dwell settings, RoFs would be stored in some form of ram type memory, and there is a slight battery drain to keep these settings stored.
[/edit -add]