John, I think you know me well enough to realise I wouldn't get into anything like roids unless I had researched it.
I would also hope you realise I'm no dumbass and whilst I don't lay claim to being an expert in physiology or biology, I do have a strategy for acquiring relevant information on the subject..and I achieve it by proxy.
Of course I could sit and study for hours and then make a decision based upon my own conclusions but I haven't really got the time and so I adopt a policy of 'weighting' data.
If a gym rat tells me he believes this or that, I will not give his account as much credence as I would say, a PhD or graduate in biology.
I seek information that is in a sense, validated by virtue of its author being formally educated and as far as I can discern, no agendas outside that of wanting to do valid research.
In this way, I can be somewhat more convinced than some fat ass pseudo-intellectual from the gym...you get my point John?
The problem here is, as you have already touched upon, is the sheer scale of the subject area and with scopes such as these, there is a fair degree of disagreement.
I'm not saying you can't rely on any of the information but you do have to sift through accounts and ultimately make a call..and that is what i do.
I'm no expert, I just listen to them.
You have previously remarked on the problem regarding lack of data in assessing long term effects of roid abuse and whilst this is a valid concern, it is no more likely than the long term effects of taking some vitamins...just because no long term studies have been done doesn't automatically mean any such study will throw up contraindications..a possibility 'yes' but that is all..you get my drift mate?