Look, there is nothing "unfair" about it. Every tournament everyone knows they play whoever signs up to play. Period. The NPPL stated, when introducing this limited Pro division concept how it would work. Is it also unfair that some teams were able to travel to Euroland and score "easy" points that others couldn't or didn't? Is it unfair to some lower ranked US Pro teams competing that most of the top scores procured by Euro teams come from so-called easier MS events? Is it ideal? No, but everyone has known what the circumstances were all along. It's the 17 high scores after all the qualifying tournies have been played. If some peeps failed to think the ramifications through--hard cheese.
And for those who think the NPPL didn't have this or something like it in mind--return to planet Earth. Besides the potential future value of the limited Pro division (more on that in a minute) it was obvious from the outset part of the rationale was to a) create lots of publicity, b) make for more compelling competition as teams fight to make the cut, and c) try to wedge out the NXL teams and/or foment more rebellion among their ranks. It was predictable and should have been expected when it started working in Denver.
While all the big boys continue to fight for their NPPL spot poor lowly peons like me still wonder just what the hotly contested spots are gonna be worth? Where does the NPPL plan go from here? Anybody fighting for their spot want to offer an answer or hazard a guess or explain your rationale for pulling out all the stops to get into the '05 NPPL Pro Division?
And, of course, that still leaves the concerns raised by paintballma which have been raised before and greeted by silence all round.